WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 189

Education, Higher - As introduced, requires the Tennessee higher education commission to develop a program to award full-time students enrolled in public institutions of higher education in this state a $250 grant for voluntarily obtaining testing for sexually transmitted diseases. - Amends TCA Title 10, Chapter 7 and Title 49.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by London Lamar

Tennessee bill would grant $250 to public university students who voluntarily test for STDs, aiming to increase screening rates among young adults through direct financial incentives.

Assigned to General Subcommittee of Senate Education Committee
#education #higher
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 189

Legislative bill overview

SB 189 would require Tennessee's higher education commission to establish a grant program offering $250 to full-time students at public colleges and universities who voluntarily get tested for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The program would be funded through amendments to state education law.

Why is this important

Public health officials view STD testing access as critical to disease prevention and early treatment, particularly among young adults aged 18-25 who have higher infection rates. The bill attempts to remove financial and logistical barriers to testing by providing direct incentives, though the actual impact would depend on participation rates and program design details.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost and funding source unclear: The bill doesn't specify how the $250 grants would be funded or what the total program cost might be if participation is high, raising questions about budget sustainability
  • Incentive structure debate: Critics may argue financial incentives for health screenings are unnecessary or could be viewed as paternalistic, while supporters see it as pragmatic harm reduction
  • Privacy and participation concerns: Students may worry about confidentiality if the higher education commission tracks testing participation, potentially discouraging enrollment in the program
  • Alternative approaches: Some may question whether $250 grants are the most cost-effective use of public health dollars compared to direct STD clinic funding or universal testing campaigns

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.