WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2485

Education - As introduced, changes the definition of economically disadvantaged for purposes of the weighted allocations generated for such students in the Tennessee investment in student achievement formula; requires the department of education to allocate additional funds to an LEA that experiences a reduction in the LEA's TISA allocation in certain circumstances; requires the department to seek an amendment to this state's Every Student Succeeds Act plan to change the definition of the economically disadvantaged student subgroup. - Amends TCA Title 49, Chapter 1 and Title 49, Chapter 3.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Kirk Haston

HB 2485 redefines economically disadvantaged students for Tennessee school funding, provides transition aid to affected districts, and seeks federal approval for the change.

Signed by Senate Speaker
#education
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2485

Legislative bill overview

HB 2485 modifies how Tennessee defines "economically disadvantaged" students for the purpose of distributing weighted education funding through the Tennessee Investment in Student Achievement (TISA) formula. The bill requires the Department of Education to provide transition funding to school districts that would lose money under the new definition and directs the state to amend its federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plan accordingly.

Why is this important

School funding formulas directly determine how much money districts receive for operations and services. Changing the definition of economically disadvantaged affects which students generate additional funding for their districts, potentially shifting millions of dollars between schools. This could impact the resources available for programs serving low-income students, including special education, remedial services, and support staff.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition change details: The bill doesn't specify what the new definition will be, raising questions about whether it will be narrower or broader than current federal/state standards and how many students would be reclassified
  • Funding transition concerns: While the bill includes transition funding for districts losing allocation, the duration and adequacy of this "hold harmless" provision is unclear—affected districts may face future budget shortfalls
  • Federal compliance complexity: Amending Tennessee's ESSA plan requires federal approval, and the state must ensure the new definition aligns with federal civil rights requirements and accountability measures

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.