WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 715

Economic development: Michigan strategic fund; compliance with the Uyghur forced labor prevention act; provide for. Amends sec. 4 of 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2004) & adds sec. 7c.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Bellino and 3 co-sponsors

Michigan bill requiring state economic development fund recipients to comply with federal Uyghur forced labor prevention rules, adding supply chain screening requirements for state funding eligibility.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
#economicdevelopment:michiganstrategicfund #statemanagement:funds
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 715

Legislative bill overview

SB 715 would amend Michigan's economic development law to require compliance with the federal Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFPLA) for entities receiving Michigan Strategic Fund support. The bill adds new compliance provisions to existing economic development statutes, potentially restricting state funding to businesses with supply chain connections to Uyghur forced labor concerns.

Why is this important

Michigan allocates significant state funds through the Michigan Strategic Fund for business development and job creation. This bill would create a screening mechanism to ensure state economic development dollars don't inadvertently support businesses implicated in forced labor practices, aligning state policy with federal trade restrictions and addressing emerging supply chain accountability concerns.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation burden: Companies may face costly audits and compliance documentation requirements to prove UFPLA adherence, potentially discouraging smaller businesses from seeking state support
  • Definition and enforcement scope: The bill doesn't specify how strictly "compliance" is defined—whether indirect supply chain connections trigger disqualification or only direct relationships
  • Interstate competitive disadvantage: If other states lack similar restrictions, Michigan businesses may face higher compliance costs than competitors, potentially making state funding less attractive

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.