WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 4194

Dutch Fork High School Dazzlers dance team won state championships in Varsity & JV Jazz, and Varsity Hip-Hop

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terry Alexander and 121 co-sponsors

Caps the inflation assumption for social service rate-setting to 200% of the prior year's increase, limiting provider rate hikes and state budgeting flexibility.

Introduced and adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4194

Summary — H 4194

Status: Introduced and adopted (House) — Introduced: 03/27/2025
Primary sponsor: Rep. Colleen M. Garry (36th Middlesex)
Classification: Filed as a resolution; bill docket contains both a substantive statutory amendment and a ceremonial House resolution.
Related docket: HD 4411 (replaces)

What the measure would do (primary substantive text)

The bill contains an amendment to Massachusetts law (referencing General Laws, Chapter 7, §22N) that would limit the estimated rate of inflation used for social service program rate-setting. Specifically, it provides:

  • "Notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary, no increase above 200% of the previous year's rate increase shall be allowed as an estimated rate of inflation for social service programs under General Laws, Chapter 7, section 22N."

In plain terms, the statute would cap the inflation estimate used to set social service provider rates at no more than twice (200% of) the prior year’s rate increase.

Key provisions and mechanics

  • Applicability: Applies to the estimated rate of inflation used when establishing or adjusting payment rates for social service programs under Chapter 7, §22N (Massachusetts).
  • Cap formula: The maximum allowable estimated inflation equals 200% of the previous year’s rate increase (i.e., double the prior year’s increase).
  • Supersedes conflicting laws/regulations: The provision is framed "notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary."

Who would be affected

  • Social service providers (contracted nonprofits, agencies, etc.) whose program rates are set or adjusted under Chapter 7, §22N — potentially limits allowable rate increases tied to inflation.
  • State budget officials and agencies that estimate inflation when negotiating or setting social service contract rates.
  • Service recipients indirectly, since provider capacity and service levels can be affected by rate-setting decisions.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Limits volatility: The cap is designed to restrain very large year-to-year jumps in the inflation estimate used in rate setting.
  • Risk of underestimating inflation: If the prior year’s increase was small (or zero), doubling a small number may still understate actual inflation, potentially constraining provider funding during periods of high general inflation.
  • Implementation questions: How prior-year increases are measured (absolute percentage points, composite indices, or legislative/applicable administrative rate changes) would affect outcomes; administrative guidance would be required.
  • Budgetary effects: Could reduce state expenditures relative to otherwise higher inflation estimates, but also may increase financial pressure on providers.

Additional material in the docket

The filed docket also includes a ceremonial House resolution (text duplicated) congratulating the Dutch Fork High School Dazzlers (Varsity and JV teams) on winning state dance championships (South Carolina). That text is ceremonial and carries no statutory effect. The docket therefore contains both (1) a substantive statutory amendment about inflation estimates and (2) a separate ceremonial resolution recognizing the dance teams.

Procedural history / timeline (selected)

  • 02/12/2025: Filed as House Docket No. 4411 (text and petition by Rep. Garry).
  • 03/25/2025: Introduced and adopted (House resolution language appears on this date).
  • 03/27/2025: Referred to the committee on House Rules.
  • 06/02/2025: Reported, referred to Joint Rules, then to Children, Families & Persons with Disabilities.
  • 06/05/2025: Senate concurred.
  • 11/18/2025: Hearing scheduled (11/18/2025, 1:00–5:00 PM, room A-2).

Note: The docket combines materials from different kinds of actions (statutory amendment and ceremonial resolution). The substantive change to Chapter 7, §22N is the primary policy element to review for budgetary and provider impact.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.