WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 787

DUI Offenses - As enacted, creates a distance to drive program study committee to help determine the feasibility of implementing a distance to drive program that would facilitate reinstatement of suspended and revoked driver licenses for criminal defendants based on meeting the objectives set by the court and completing all the requirements set by the department of safety. - Amends TCA Title 16; Title 39; Title 40 and Title 55.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Debra Moody

Tennessee establishes a study committee to explore creating a "distance to drive" program allowing DUI offenders to regain suspended/revoked licenses by meeting court objectives and safety department requirements.

Comp. became Pub. Ch. 451
#duioffenses
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 787

Legislative bill overview

HB 787 establishes a study committee to examine the feasibility of creating a "distance to drive" program in Tennessee that would allow individuals with suspended or revoked licenses due to DUI convictions to regain driving privileges by meeting court-imposed objectives and completing requirements set by the Department of Safety. The bill amends multiple sections of Tennessee code related to DUI offenses and driver licensing.

Why is this important

This addresses a practical challenge faced by people convicted of DUI offenses who lose driving privileges—they may struggle to meet court conditions, attend treatment programs, or maintain employment without access to transportation. A structured reinstatement program could reduce recidivism by facilitating rehabilitation pathways while maintaining public safety through court oversight and departmental requirements.

Potential points of contention

  • Public safety concerns: Critics may worry that allowing license reinstatement for DUI offenders could endanger public safety if program requirements are insufficient or inadequately monitored
  • Equity and accessibility: The feasibility and implementation of such a program raises questions about whether requirements will be realistic for low-income individuals who lack alternative transportation or resources
  • Program scope and standards: Disagreement may arise over what court objectives and departmental requirements should be, and whether standards will be uniformly applied across jurisdictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.