WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1092

Disability inclusion pilot project established, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Bierman

Establishes a disability inclusion pilot project funded by state dollars to test inclusive practices and evaluate ways to improve participation of people with disabilities.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Human Services Finance and Policy
#disabilitiesandaccess #humanservicesandhumanservicesdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1092

Summary of HF 1092 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)

Title

Disability inclusion pilot project established, and money appropriated.

Purpose and intent

HF 1092 proposes to establish a pilot project focused on disability inclusion. The bill authorizes the appropriation of state funds to support the pilot, with the goal of improving inclusion and participation of people with disabilities in relevant programs and community activities. The legislation is designed to test targeted strategies or models that can inform broader policy and programmatic changes if the pilot proves effective.

Key provisions and changes

  • Establishment of a disability inclusion pilot project: Creates a defined program to trial inclusive practices or interventions related to disability access, participation, and outcomes.
  • Funding authorization/appropriation: Allocates state dollars to support the pilot project. The bill specifies the mechanism for providing the funds, including potential annual or one-time appropriations as part of the state budget.
  • Scope and activities (anticipated): While the text provided does not list every detail, typical elements of such pilots may include:
    • Development and implementation of inclusive services or supports.
    • Collaboration with disability advocacy groups, service providers, and relevant agencies.
    • Data collection and evaluation to assess effectiveness, accessibility, and participant outcomes.
    • Methods for scaling successful approaches beyond the pilot if warranted.
  • Reporting and evaluation: Likely requirements for reporting findings to the legislature, including performance metrics and outcomes to determine future policy adoption or expansion (common in pilot projects, though precise reporting provisions would be specified in the bill’s full text).

Note: The summary above reflects common components of disability inclusion pilots. Exact provisions (e.g., exact funding amounts, duration of the pilot, eligible participants, and administrative oversight) would be specified in the full bill text.

Who is affected

  • Individuals with disabilities: Primary beneficiaries who may gain enhanced access, services, and opportunities as a result of inclusive practices tested by the pilot.
  • State agencies and program administrators: Involved in implementing the pilot, ensuring accessibility, collecting data, and coordinating with partners.
  • Service providers and advocacy organizations: Partners in design, implementation, and evaluation of the pilot; potential recipients of funding or sub-grants.
  • Taxpayers and the state budget: Fiscal impact through appropriated funds for the pilot.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced on February 17, 2025, and referred to the House committee with jurisdiction over Human Services Finance and Policy.
  • Next steps (typical for such bills):
    • Committee hearings to debate provisions, hear testimony, and make amendments.
    • Potential floor debate and votes in the House, and eventual consideration by the Senate (if companion or corresponding bill exists) with similar fiscal and programmatic provisions.
    • If enacted, implementation would begin according to the schedule specified in the bill (e.g., start date for the pilot, duration, and reporting deadlines).

Notes

  • The bill’s sponsor is Rep. Robert Bierman (co-sponsor), indicating bipartisan or cross-aisle collaboration depending on the final text and context.
  • The exact dollar amounts, duration, eligible participants, and governance structure (agency responsible, oversight, and reporting cadence) will be clarified in the full bill text and any amendments adopted during committee consideration.

This summary outlines the bill’s core aims and potential impact based on the title and action history. For a complete understanding, reviewing the full bill text and any fiscal notes or analysis from the Minnesota Legislature is recommended.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.