WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 5725

$DHS-TASC MENTAL HLTH CENTER

104th Regular Session Introduced by Sharon Chung and 2 co-sponsors

Creates or designates a DHS-linked mental health center to expand access, coordination, and services for Illinois residents in need of mental health support.

Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Dave Vella
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5725

Bill Summary: HB 5725 (Illinois, 104th Session) – "$DHS-TASC MENTAL HLTH CENTER"

Purpose and Intent

  • The bill appears to establish or authorize a program or facility related to mental health services, specifically labeled as "$DHS-TASC MENTAL HLTH CENTER." While the exact statutory language is not provided here, the naming suggests a collaboration involving the Illinois Department of Human Services (DHS) and a programmatic center addressing mental health needs, potentially for youth, families, or high-need populations.
  • The bill’s basic aim is to enhance access to mental health support, treatment options, and coordination of care within the DHS framework, potentially leveraging a specialized center model.

Key Provisions and Changes (as inferred)

  • Establishment or designation: Creation or formal recognition of a mental health center connected to DHS and TASC (which commonly refers to Temporary Assistance for State Custody in some contexts, though TASC could represent a specific program acronym in Illinois). The exact functions would be defined in the bill text, likely including service delivery, governance, and funding streams.
  • Service scope: Likely to cover assessment, treatment, counseling, crisis intervention, and potentially wraparound or integrated services for individuals with mental health needs. May include coordination with other DHS programs or community-based providers.
  • Funding and resources: Potential appropriation or authorization of state funds to support the center’s operations, staff, facilities, and related program activities. There may be specifics on grant mechanisms, reimbursement rates, or matching requirements.
  • Governance and oversight: Possible provisions on leadership structure, advisory boards, reporting requirements, performance metrics, and accountability to ensure program integrity and outcomes.
  • Eligibility and enrollment: Criteria for who can access center services, referral pathways, and process for enrolling participants, including any prioritization for certain populations (e.g., children, families, high-need individuals).
  • Collaboration and referrals: Provisions guiding interagency collaboration with DHS, health care providers, schools, and community organizations to facilitate comprehensive care and smooth referrals.
  • Timeline and implementation: Any phased rollout, start dates for operations, milestones, and interim reporting requirements as the program scales.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Primary: Individuals and families served by Illinois DHS who need mental health services, particularly those eligible for or connected to DHS programs.
  • Providers: DHS staff, contracted community mental health centers, hospitals, and other behavioral health providers involved in referrals, service delivery, and funding administration.
  • State and local partners: Schools, health systems, social service agencies, and potentially TASC-related entities collaborating to deliver integrated care.
  • Budget and stakeholders: State budgetary processes would be impacted by funding allocations, as well as any reporting or compliance responsibilities tied to the center.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and referrals: The bill was filed and received its first reading on March 12, 2026, and referred to the Rules Committee, indicating initial steps in the legislative process.
  • Additional actions: Co-sponsors were added on May 4 and May 14, 2026 (Rep. Sharon Chung, Rep. Dave Vella). These actions indicate movement toward committee consideration or broader legislative support, though no further committee actions or floor votes are listed in the provided history.
  • Next steps: If advanced, the bill would typically go to the relevant committee for hearings, potential amendments, then consideration by the full chamber, and, if passed, reconciliation with the other chamber and eventual enactment.

Notes

  • The exact statutory language, definitions, funding levels, and implementation details are not included in the provided information. A full reading of the bill text would be necessary to confirm the precise scope, eligibility, funding mechanisms, and operational requirements.
  • The bill’s impact will hinge on how the center is authorized (new agency, program within DHS, or partnership with TASC), the level of funding, and the targeted populations served.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary once the full bill text is available, or incorporate stakeholder impact analysis once more specifics (costs, timelines, and performance metrics) are known.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.