WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2679

Department of Human Services; allow agency discretion for establishing or using certain federal reporting systems.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by David Blount

SB 2679 lets political committees pay for childcare and security for public officials or candidates when reasonably needed for duties, expanding allowable campaign expenditures.

Died In Committee
#accountability #efficiency #transparency #publichealthandhumanservices #publichealthandwelfare
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2679

Summary — SB 2679 (2025) — Election Code: political committee expenditures for childcare and security

Status: Died in Committee (per provided metadata)
Primary sponsor: Sen. Adriane Johnson
Related bill: HB 1862 (companion)
Introduced: March 13, 2025 (as provided)

Note on sources: The bill text supplied amends 10 ILCS 5/9‑8.10 (Election Code). Some header metadata (a different bill title about the Department of Human Services) appears inconsistent with the text; this summary is based on the Election Code amendment text provided.

Purpose / intent

SB 2679 would clarify and expand the categories of political‑committee expenditures that are permitted for public officials or candidates (or their family members). Specifically, it removes a restriction that previously prohibited certain payments to a public official, candidate, or family member and explicitly allows political committees to pay for (a) childcare or dependent care when reasonably necessary for the official/candidate to perform political or governmental duties, and (b) security — including security at a public official's or candidate's residence or other security services — when reasonably necessary because of risks arising from the official's or candidate's political or governmental duties.

Key provisions

  • Amends 10 ILCS 5/9‑8.10, item (11), to state that the prohibition on payments to a public official/candidate or family member does not apply to:
    • Childcare or dependent care reasonably necessary to allow the official/candidate to fulfill political or governmental duties.
    • Security at an official’s or candidate’s residence or other security services when those services are reasonably necessary due to risks related to their duties.
  • Retains existing campaign finance restrictions elsewhere in the section (e.g., prohibitions on using campaign funds for personal residence debt, excessive personal expenditures, certain vehicle purchases, tuition, etc.).
  • Confirms enforcement authority for the State Board (presumably the State Board of Elections) to investigate violations, issue rulings/opinions, and levy fines:
    • Fines up to $500 for each expenditure of $500 or less.
    • For expenditures over $500, fines may be up to the amount of the expenditure plus $500 for each such expenditure.
  • Retains existing carve‑outs permitting committees controlled by officeholders to pay reasonable expenses tied to governmental/public service duties and provisions about forfeiture when committees are controlled by convicted persons (per related statutes).

Who would be affected

  • Political committees (including candidate‑controlled committees) seeking to use funds for safety or caregiver services for officeholders or candidates.
  • Public officials and candidates (and their family members) who could receive such services funded by political committees.
  • The State Board of Elections (or other enforcing body) through expanded enforcement duties related to allowable uses.

Potential impact

  • Enables political committees to fund security measures (including at a private residence) and caregiving that are tied to legitimate risks or duties, potentially increasing committee expenditures in these areas.
  • Raises oversight and transparency questions about when such expenditures are “reasonably necessary”; enforcement and reporting will be important to prevent misuse.
  • The bill did not advance (listed as Died In Committee), so the change was not enacted.

Legislative actions (selected, per provided record)

  • Filed/received by Secretary of the Senate: March 13, 2025
  • Referred to various committees (Local Government; Public Health and Human Services; Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency; Public Health and Welfare)
  • Read first time: April 3, 2025 (per record)
  • Status listed as: Died In Committee

If you want, I can produce suggested legislative language redlines showing exactly how item (11) would read before and after this amendment, or draft an analysis of enforcement/recordkeeping implications for campaign finance reporting.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.