WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 173

Cursive instruction in elementary school appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Steve Cwodzinski and 1 co-sponsor

Minnesota bill appropriates state funding to mandate cursive handwriting instruction in elementary schools, reallocating educational resources toward a specific pedagogical requirement.

Withdrawn and re-referred to Education Policy
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 173

Legislative bill overview

SF 173 appropriates state funding to support cursive handwriting instruction in Minnesota elementary schools. The bill allocates resources to ensure students learn cursive writing as part of the standard curriculum, reversing or supplementing previous de-emphasis of this skill in favor of digital literacy.

Why is this important

Cursive instruction has become inconsistent across U.S. schools since the 2010 Common Core standards removed it as a requirement. This bill directly addresses whether states should fund a specific pedagogical choice, involving questions about curriculum priorities, teacher training costs, and educational resource allocation at a time when many schools face budget constraints.

Potential points of contention

  • Opportunity cost: Funding dedicated to cursive instruction reduces resources available for other subjects (STEM, literacy remediation, special education support) that some argue have higher educational ROI
  • Evidence debate: Educational research shows mixed results on cursive's cognitive benefits versus typing skills; advocates cite benefits for fine motor development and historical document reading, while critics question relevance in digital-first world
  • Implementation burden: Schools require teacher training and curriculum materials; rural/underfunded districts may struggle more than wealthy suburban districts to implement, creating equity questions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.