WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 5426

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for registered sex offender working at a business that provides services to minors; provide for. Amends sec. 11b, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.11b). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5425'25

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Matt Bierlein

Michigan bill establishing enhanced sentencing guidelines for registered sex offenders employed at businesses serving minors, tied to companion legislation HB 5425.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
#children:other #criminalprocedure:sentencingguidelines #criminalprocedure:sexoffenderregistration
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5426

Legislative bill overview

HB 5426 amends Michigan's sentencing guidelines to establish specific sentencing provisions for registered sex offenders who work at businesses that provide services to minors. The bill is tied to HB 5425, suggesting coordinated legislation on this topic. The amendment modifies the existing sentencing framework under Michigan's 1927 Public Act 175.

Why is this important

This legislation addresses public safety concerns by creating targeted sentencing guidelines for a specific category of offense—sex offenders working in positions with access to children. Such provisions can influence judicial sentencing decisions and potentially increase penalties for individuals deemed to pose heightened risk. The measure reflects ongoing policy debates about protecting minors from abuse and managing sex offender employment restrictions.

Potential points of contention

  • Employment restrictions vs. rehabilitation: Critics may argue that restricting employment opportunities for all registered sex offenders in child-serving businesses is overly broad and contradicts rehabilitation goals, while supporters contend it prioritizes child safety over offender employment rights
  • Sentencing severity: Questions may arise about whether enhanced sentencing guidelines are proportionate or if they constitute double punishment (once at initial sentencing, again through employment restrictions)
  • Definitional scope: The bill's application to "businesses that provide services to minors" lacks clarity—the definition could be interpreted narrowly (pediatricians, schools) or broadly (retail stores, restaurants), significantly affecting who is covered

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.