WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 5918

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for certain crimes; update. Amends (See bill). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5907'26, HB 5908'26, HB 5909'26, HB 5910'26, HB 5911'26, HB 5912'26, HB 5913'26, HB 5914'26, HB 5915'26, HB 5916'26, HB 5917'26

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Will Bruck and 4 co-sponsors

HB 5918 updates and harmonizes Michigan sentencing guidelines across multiple Chapter XVII provisions to tighten and standardize penalties for designated offenses.

bill electronically reproduced 04/29/2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5918

Summary of Michigan HB 5918 (2025-2026)

Aimed at amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, HB 5918 would update sentencing guidelines provisions and related procedural sections of Chapter XVII of Michigan’s 1927 Code. The bill appears to be part of a package tying together several sentencing-related measures (tied to HB 5907–5917 and HB 5918).

Note: The bill text provided lists numerous sections in Chapter XVII (sections 11b, 12e, 12f, 13m, 13n, 14a, 14h, 15d, 16d, 16f, 16g, 16i, 16j, 16k, 16l, 16m, 16p, 16q, 16r, 16s, 16t, 16w, 16x, 16y, 16bb, 17b, 17g) and notes amendments dating from various years. The specific substantive changes are not enumerated in the excerpt provided, but the title indicates a focus on sentencing guidelines for certain crimes and updates to sentencing provisions. Below is a structured, neutral summary based on the available information.

1) Purpose and Intent

  • Update and harmonize Michigan’s sentencing guidelines for certain offenses.
  • Refresh or modify multiple sections of Chapter XVII of the Code of Criminal Procedure to reflect current policy, practice, or statutory alignment.
  • Likely objective: improve the clarity, consistency, and/or appropriateness of penalties and sentencing procedures for specified crimes.

2) Key Provisions and Changes (as implied)

Because the full text of the amendments is not provided here, the summary focuses on the bill’s scope and typical areas such amendments cover:

  • Amendments to sentencing guideline calculations and application for designated crimes.
  • Revisions to scoring rules, offense classifications, or offense variables used to determine sentence lengths.
  • Adjustments to procedures related to sentencing, including timelines, review processes, or court obligations during sentencing.
  • Possible alignment with prior reforms by reference to amendments from multiple years (e.g., 2010–2024), suggesting a comprehensive update rather than isolated changes.
  • The act enumerates many specific sections, indicating a broad reform affecting multiple aspects of sentencing within Chapter XVII.

3) Who or What Would Be Affected

  • Defendants convicted of crimes governed by Michigan’s sentencing guidelines under Chapter XVII.
  • Judges and prosecutors who apply and argue guidelines-based sentences.
  • Courts administering sentencing procedures and records.
  • Potentially impacted: defense counsel, probation/gal enforcement agencies, and the Michigan Department of Corrections, depending on how the changes alter sentence lengths, conditions, or supervision.

4) Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced: April 29, 2026.
  • Referred to: Michigan House Judiciary Committee for consideration.
  • Status: At the committee stage; no floor vote or enactment timing provided in the available information.
  • Tangentially, the bill is tied to a package of related bills (HB 5907–5917, and HB 5908, etc.), indicating a coordinated reform effort with potential joint consideration or synchronized effective dates if enacted.

5) Practical Considerations

  • If enacted, prosecutors and defense attorneys will need to review affected sections to determine how sentences for specific offenses may change.
  • The breadth of sections involved suggests a wide-ranging update that could affect multiple crime categories and sentencing paradigms.
  • The effective date (not provided here) would determine when the new guidelines apply (often prospective for new cases and may have transitional rules).

If you’d like, I can:

  • Pull out the exact textual changes from the bill once the full bill text is available.
  • Provide a side-by-side comparison with current law for the affected sections.
  • Prepare a bill memo highlighting potential fiscal impact, implementation steps, and notable policy shifts.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.