WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 4609

Criminal penalties increase and scope expansion of the doxxing crime

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by John Hoffman and 2 co-sponsors

Minnesota bill increases criminal doxxing penalties and expands what conduct qualifies, aiming to deter online harassment campaigns while raising free speech definitional concerns.

Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4609

Legislative bill overview

SF 4609 increases criminal penalties for doxxing (publishing private identifying information to incite harassment or harm) and expands the scope of what constitutes the crime. The bill appears to strengthen protections against coordinated online harassment campaigns by making violations more serious offenses and potentially broadening the definition of what conduct qualifies as criminal doxxing.

Why is this important

Doxxing has become a significant problem in online spaces, enabling real-world harassment, stalking, and violence against individuals. Stronger penalties may serve as a deterrent, while scope expansion could address gaps where coordinated harassment campaigns currently fall outside existing law. However, this also touches on sensitive questions about balancing free speech protections with safety.

Potential points of contention

  • Definitional clarity: Expanding the scope of doxxing requires precise legal language; overly broad definitions could inadvertently criminalize legitimate public information sharing or journalism
  • Intent vs. outcome: Questions about whether the law should require intent to harm or if reckless endangerment suffices, affecting prosecution difficulty and false accusation risks
  • First Amendment tensions: Critics may argue enhanced penalties could chill legitimate speech, activism, or exposés of public figures, depending on how exceptions for newsworthy information are written

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.