WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 588

Criminal Offenses - As introduced, creates a Class E felony for altering or defacing a permanent distinguishing number on a firearm and selling, purchasing, or possessing such a firearm with a mandatory minimum sentence of 180 days incarceration. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 14, Part 1; Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13 and Title 40.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Ed Butler

HB 588 orders the LRC to study adopting UPHPA and related heirs-property partition reforms, and to report findings and proposed legislation to the next General Assembly session.

Taken off notice for cal in s/c Criminal Justice Subcommittee of Judiciary Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 588

HB 588 — “Heirs Property Study” — Summary

Status: Special Message Received From House
Introduced: November 12, 2024
Subject areas: Property law, estates, civil actions/partition, legislative study, courts

Main purpose

HB 588 directs the Legislative Research Commission (LRC) to study whether the General Assembly should adopt the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA) and to examine other issues related to partitioning real property. The bill does not itself change property law; it charges the LRC with performing a study and producing recommendations (including any draft legislation).

Key provisions

  • Directs the LRC to:
    • Evaluate whether the State should enact the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act.
    • Study additional issues the LRC considers relevant related to partition of real property.
  • Requires the LRC to report its findings and any proposed legislation to the General Assembly (the bill text specifies reporting to the next regular session).
  • Effective date: the act becomes effective when it becomes law.

(Note: the text is a study/directive measure — it creates no immediate changes to partition procedure or substantive property rights.)

What the study will examine (context)

Although HB 588 itself only orders a study, the UPHPA that the study targets typically includes provisions such as:
- A definition of “heirs property” (tenancy-in-common property acquired from a relative and often having many small fractional owners).
- Requirements for enhanced notice to cotenants and extra protections for vulnerable heirs (e.g., extended buyout periods, appraisal-based valuation, preference for partition in kind where practicable, limits on forced sales at auction).
- Procedures for valuation, cotenant buyouts, and sale distribution.
The LRC’s study would consider whether and how such reforms should be adapted for the State.

Who would be affected by any resulting legislation

  • Owners of heirs property (commonly family-held, often low-income or minority-owned parcels).
  • Tenants-in-common and other cotenants involved in partition disputes.
  • Courts that adjudicate partition actions, county clerks and land-recording offices.
  • Legal service providers, housing and community advocates, and local governments concerned with land loss and property tax/title issues.

Potential impacts

  • If the LRC recommends enactment, subsequent legislation could reduce involuntary or inequitable forced sales, improve notice and redemption/buyout rights for family owners, and provide clearer valuation and partition processes.
  • Fiscal effects on state or local government are likely limited at the study stage; any downstream fiscal impacts would depend on enacted reforms (e.g., administrative or court workload changes).

Procedural / timeline notes

  • HB 588 is a study/directive bill; it requires the LRC to report findings and proposed legislation to the next regular session of the General Assembly (per the bill text).
  • No substantive statutory changes occur until (and unless) the General Assembly adopts legislation based on the LRC’s report.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.