WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 273

Criminal Offenses - As introduced, clarifies that a school employee does not commit the criminal offense of falsifying educational and academic documents for altering, creating, or duplicating the grade of a student in an educational or academic document if the alteration, creation, or duplication is due to the student obtaining the grade through a program that allows students to retake a failed course, exam, or assignment and earn credit. - Amends TCA Section 39-14-136 and Title 49.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Brent Taylor

Tennessee law now exempts school employees from fraud charges when updating student grades through authorized course retake or grade recovery programs.

Placed on Senate Message Calendar for 3/19/2026
#criminaloffenses
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 273

Legislative bill overview

SB 273 amends Tennessee criminal law to clarify that school employees are not committing fraud when they alter student grades in educational records if those grade changes result from legitimate grade recovery or retake programs. The bill specifically exempts grade modifications from the crime of falsifying educational documents when students have earned new grades through authorized retake opportunities.

Why is this important

Schools increasingly use grade recovery programs allowing students to retake failed courses or exams to improve their academic record. Without this clarification, well-intentioned administrators updating grades could face criminal falsification charges, potentially discouraging schools from implementing these educational programs. The bill protects educators from unintended legal consequences while supporting grade replacement policies.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition ambiguity: The bill relies on determining what constitutes an authorized "program that allows students to retake" courses, which could create disputes over which grade changes qualify for protection versus which constitute actual fraud.
  • Record-keeping standards: Clarifying when grade alterations are legitimate versus fraudulent requires robust documentation practices; insufficient record-keeping could enable undetectable grade manipulation under the guise of retake programs.
  • Transcript transparency: Grade replacement can obscure a student's complete academic history; critics may argue this hides struggles from colleges/employers, while supporters contend it reflects mastery more fairly.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.