WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1399

Criminal Offenses - As enacted, creates an offense for a person who harms or threatens to harm an individual involved in the judicial process or a family member of such person with the intent to impede, intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against the justice system participant in connection with their participation in the judicial process, punishable as a Class E felony. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 16.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Kerry Roberts

Tennessee creates Class E felony for threatening or harming judges, jurors, witnesses, or their families to intimidate or retaliate against justice system participation, effective July 2025.

Pub. Ch. 468
#criminaloffenses
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1399

Legislative bill overview

SB 1399 creates a new Class E felony in Tennessee for harming or threatening to harm judges, jurors, witnesses, prosecutors, defense attorneys, or their family members with intent to intimidate, interfere with, or retaliate against their participation in judicial proceedings. The law takes effect July 1, 2025, and amends Tennessee's criminal code under Title 39, Chapter 16.

Why is this important

Justice system participants—particularly jurors and witnesses—have faced increasing threats and intimidation that can undermine fair trials and deter public participation in the courts. This law creates explicit legal consequences for such conduct, potentially strengthening protections for people involved in the judicial process and encouraging their participation without fear of retaliation.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition precision: "Threatens to harm" may be interpreted broadly; critics could argue the language is vague enough to chill legitimate speech or protest activity related to judicial decisions
  • Enforcement disparities: Questions about how consistently prosecutors will apply the law across different jurisdictions and whether it might be used selectively
  • Family member scope: Including family members expands liability significantly; some argue this could create unintended consequences or be used as a pressure tactic beyond the direct participant's control

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.