WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 460

Crimes: controlled substances; crime of manufacturing, creating, delivering, or possessing with intent certain schedule 1 and 2 controlled substances; modify penalties. Amends sec. 7401 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.7401).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Bellino and 5 co-sponsors

Michigan bill modifies criminal penalties for manufacturing and possessing Schedule 1-2 controlled substances, affecting drug offense sentencing structure.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
#controlledsubstances:narcoticdrugs #crimes:controlledsubstances #crimes:penalties
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 460

Legislative bill overview

SB 460 modifies criminal penalties for manufacturing, creating, delivering, or possessing with intent certain Schedule 1 and 2 controlled substances under Michigan law. The bill amends the state's controlled substances penalty structure, though specific penalty modifications are not detailed in the available information. This represents a revision to how Michigan's criminal justice system treats serious drug offenses.

Why is this important

Drug offense penalties significantly affect sentencing lengths, incarceration rates, and individual criminal records that impact employment and housing opportunities. Michigan's controlled substances laws directly influence the state's prison population and criminal justice costs, making penalty changes a substantive policy matter affecting thousands of potential defendants and their communities.

Potential points of contention

  • Penalty direction unclear: Without knowing whether penalties increase or decrease, stakeholders cannot assess whether this toughens or softens drug enforcement, creating uncertainty about criminal justice philosophy
  • Equity concerns: Modifications to Schedule 1 and 2 substances may disproportionately affect certain demographic groups if enforcement patterns differ by community
  • Public safety vs. rehabilitation debate: Changes may reflect disagreement between those prioritizing incapacitation/deterrence and those favoring treatment-focused approaches for drug offenses

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.