WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 4

Courts, Supreme Court of Tennessee - As introduced, requires the expenses of the Tennessee supreme court to include each year an amount sufficient to provide the chief justice with a security detail to transport and accompany the chief justice on all official state business. - Amends TCA Title 16 and Title 17.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Paul Rose

Creates a DOJ-run MMIP Justice Program to coordinate, assist investigations, publish case data, and report annually on MMIP cases in California.

Withdrawn.
#courts #supremecourtoftennessee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 4

SB 4 — Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons Justice Program (Cervantes)

Main purpose

Establishes a Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons (MMIP) Justice Program within the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to improve coordination, investigation support, data publication, and legislative reporting for active and inactive cases involving missing and murdered Indigenous people in California — including cases involving human trafficking.

Key provisions

  • Adds Government Code §15008 establishing the MMIP Justice Program within and under the discretion of the DOJ.
  • Program responsibilities include:
    • Acting as a liaison and facilitating collaboration among tribal victims’ families, tribal governments, and federal, tribal, state, and out‑of‑state law enforcement (for active and inactive MMIP cases, including human trafficking).
    • Providing technical assistance to law enforcement agencies already investigating MMIP cases (investigative support, tools, training guidance).
    • Publishing data, where appropriate, on the number of and facts about MMIP cases in California.
    • Submitting an annual report to both houses of the Legislature that must include:
    • Cases for which the DOJ acted as liaison and provided technical assistance;
    • The published case data described above;
    • Analysis and recommendations to improve collaboration and coordination between local, state, and tribal governments.
  • Reporting timeline/sunset: the annual report requirement is (in the bill text and committee documents) scheduled to be inoperative after a specified sunset date (listed in different versions as January 1, 2029 or January 1, 2028) pursuant to Section 10231.5; the bill cross‑references Section 9795 for report submission format.
  • Implementation: the program is created “within and under the discretion of the DOJ” — DOJ sets operational details subject to this statutory framework.

Who is affected

  • Primary: DOJ (responsibility for operating the program), California tribal governments, tribal families of missing/murdered Indigenous people, and local/state law enforcement agencies.
  • Secondary: federal and out‑of‑state law enforcement partners; victim service providers; legislative oversight bodies; potentially the public (through published data).
  • Potential privacy and tribal sovereignty considerations: data publication and interagency coordination implicate victim privacy, sensitive case information, and tribal‑state relations.

Fiscal and procedural notes

  • Legislative counsel digest indicates Fiscal Committee review; the bill itself states “Appropriation: NO” but was referred to fiscal/appropriations committees — implementation may require DOJ resources (staff, data systems, outreach) and could lead to budget requests.
  • Procedural status shown in committee documents: bill introduced (May 2025 documents), considered in Senate committees and placed on legislative calendars; the top metadata lists introduction (Aug 15, 2025) and “Passed 1st Reading.” Check the current legislative status with the Legislature’s website for the latest actions and any enacted changes (notably the sunset year and report formatting).

Potential impact and issues to watch

  • Improves central coordination, supports investigations, and aims to create a consistent statewide data picture about MMIP cases.
  • Effectiveness depends on DOJ resourcing, data quality/standards, protection of victims’ privacy, and respectful coordination with tribal sovereignty and tribal investigative roles.
  • Watch for implementation details (staffing, data publication protocols, MOUs with tribes and local agencies) and any amendments changing report timelines or duties.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.