WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 1827

Court ordered payment for comprehensive assessments covered by medical assistance or the behavioral health fund prohibition provision

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Abeler and 3 co-sponsors

Establishes who pays for court-ordered comprehensive assessments when MA covers the service, clarifying payment responsibility and interaction with the Behavioral Health Fund provi

Author added Clark
#chemicaldependency #courts #legalproceedings
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 1827

Summary: SF 1827 — Court ordered payment for comprehensive assessments covered by medical assistance or the behavioral health fund prohibition provision

Overview

SF 1827 is a Minnesota Senate bill introduced on February 24, 2025. Its title suggests the measure concerns who pays for court-ordered, comprehensive assessments when those assessments are covered by medical assistance (MA) or are addressed under provisions related to the Behavioral Health Fund prohibition. The bill appears to interact with existing funding or prohibitions related to behavioral health services and court-ordered assessments. A companion bill exists in the House as HF 1995.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to address payment for court-ordered comprehensive assessments that are eligible for payment under MA or under provisions governing the Behavioral Health Fund.
  • It may modify, clarify, or create procedures for determining which entity is responsible for payment when MA covers the assessment and when the Behavioral Health Fund prohibition provisions apply.
  • The exact statutory changes, definitions, and conditions would be specified in the bill text (not provided here).

Key provisions and changes (as inferred from title and status)

  • Payment responsibility: Likely establishes or clarifies who pays for court-ordered comprehensive assessments if MA covers the service, potentially reducing or prohibiting other funding sources.
  • Interaction with the Behavioral Health Fund: References to the “prohibition provision” suggest amendments or clarifications related to how the Behavioral Health Fund may be used for these assessments.
  • Court and provider roles: May specify obligations for courts, counties, or behavioral health providers in processing payment and compliance when assessments are court-ordered.
  • Coverage scope: Implicitly concerns comprehensive assessments tied to chemical dependency or behavioral health, given the bill’s subject matter.

Note: The exact statutory language and concrete provisions are not included in the provided information. The above outlines are based on the bill’s title and status.

Affected parties

  • Recipients of medical assistance undergoing court-ordered comprehensive assessments.
  • Behavioral health providers and assessment service providers.
  • Courts, county agencies, and state departments administering MA and the Behavioral Health Fund.
  • Entities responsible for funding court-ordered services.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced: February 24, 2025.
  • Referred to Human Services on February 24, 2025.
  • Committee action: March 6, 2025, with a report stating “To pass as amended and re-refer to Judiciary and Public Safety.”
  • Author addition: Clark added as author on March 27, 2025.
  • Related legislation: HF 1995 is the companion bill in the House.

Practical considerations

  • If enacted, the bill could influence budget allocations and reimbursement practices for court-ordered assessments, potentially impacting individuals who rely on MA for such services.
  • The specific fiscal impact, implementation timeline, and any transitional provisions would depend on the enacted text.

For a thorough understanding, reviewing the bill text (SF 1827) and the companion HF 1995, along with any committee amendments, will be essential.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.