WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 2199

Cost-benefit analysis for proposed guideways required, and report required.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Patti Anderson and 1 co-sponsor

HF 2199 requires a cost-benefit analysis and report for proposed guideways, ensuring MnDOT and planners weigh economic and social impacts before moving forward.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Transportation Finance and Policy
#transportationandtransportationdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 2199

Summary of HF 2199 (Minnesota)

Overview

  • Bill Number: HF 2199
  • Title: Cost-benefit analysis for proposed guideways required, and report required
  • Subject: Transportation and Transportation Department
  • Status: Introduction and first reading; referred to the Committee on Transportation Finance and Policy
  • Introduced: March 12, 2025
  • Related Bill (companion): SF 252

Purpose and Intent

HF 2199 appears to mandate a formal evaluation framework for proposed transportation guideways by requiring a cost-benefit analysis and a subsequent report. The goal, based on the title and committee placement, is to ensure that proposed guideways are assessed for their economic, financial, and broader societal impacts before moving forward in the planning or approval process.

Key Provisions (as indicated by the bill’s title)

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis Requirement: Any proposed guideway project would be subject to a mandated cost-benefit analysis. This implies a systematic evaluation of expected costs, benefits, and trade-offs associated with the proposal.
  • Report Requirement: The analysis would be accompanied by a formal report detailing methods, findings, assumptions, and conclusions to inform decision-makers.

Note: The full text of the bill is not provided here, so specifics such as who conducts the analysis, the required contents of the analysis, the methodology standards, thresholds for decision-making, timelines for completion, and any exemptions are not included in this summary.

Affected Entities and Impacts

  • Primary Stakeholders: Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and other state or local transportation planning agencies involved with guideway proposals.
  • Impact on Projects: Potentially increased upfront planning and analytical requirements for proposed guideways, which could affect project timelines and funding decisions.
  • Public Accountability: The reporting requirement aims to improve transparency by documenting the economic and social rationale for proposed guideways.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Current Status: Introduced and assigned to the Transportation Finance and Policy Committee for consideration.
  • Next Steps: The bill would undergo committee review, potential amendments, and floor action. Passage would move the bill to the other chamber (if applicable) and, eventually, to conference committees if differences arise.
  • Relation to Companion: SF 252 in the Senate serves as the companion bill; coordinated or parallel action may occur between the two bodies.

Additional Context

  • The bill is categorized under transportation policy and involves the Transportation Department, signaling a focus on formalized analytical processes for guideway projects (e.g., rail or transit guideways) within Minnesota.
  • Until the full text is available, the specifics of methodology, inclusions/exclusions, and implementation timelines remain to be clarified.

Next Steps for Interested Parties

  • Monitor HF 2199’s progress through the Transportation Finance and Policy committee.
  • Compare with SF 252 to gaugeSenate alignment and potential compromise language.
  • Review the full bill text when released to understand detailed requirements, timelines, and any fiscal implications.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.