WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1246

Consumer Protection - As introduced, requires the office of the attorney general and reporter to submit to the chair of the house committee having jurisdiction over consumer protection and the chair of the commerce and labor committee of the senate a report on the number of investigations into violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977 in which artificial intelligence was used to effectuate an unfair or deceptive act or practice affecting the conduct of any trade or commerce between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2025; requires the report to be submitted no later than July 1, 2026; allows the report to be submitted electronically. - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 12; Title 39; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 50; Title 55; Title 61; Title 62; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67 and Title 68.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Kevin Vaughan

When a county lacks a resident/available coroner, sheriffs or designated officers must use an adjacent county coroner or, if needed, the state forensic examiner to determine medica

P2C, caption bill, held on desk - pending amdt.
#consumerprotection
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1246

Summary — HB 1246 (North Dakota)

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 11‑19.1‑06 of the North Dakota Century Code — Individuals authorized to act in the absence of a coroner

Main purpose

To clarify and expand who may perform coroner duties in counties where a coroner does not reside or is not available, and to establish a clear escalation path (including use of the state forensic examiner) when local coroners cannot reasonably respond.

Key provisions

  • Amends NDCC § 11‑19.1‑06 to specify that, in counties where a coroner is not resident or available, the duties of the coroner:
    • Must be performed by the sheriff, the State Highway Patrol, or any special agent of the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI).
    • Require the sheriff, State Highway Patrol, or BCI special agent to call upon the nearest coroner or deputy coroner from another (adjacent) county to investigate the medical cause of death for coroner cases in that county.
  • Provides an alternate escalation: if distance or adverse conditions make an adjacent county coroner unavailable, the sheriff, State Highway Patrol, or BCI special agent shall request the state forensic examiner — or the examiner’s designee — to investigate and certify the medical cause of death.

Who is affected

  • Counties without a resident or available coroner (policy directly applies to them).
  • Local law enforcement: county sheriffs, State Highway Patrol personnel, and BCI special agents (they may perform duties and must make required calls/requests).
  • Coroners and deputy coroners in adjacent counties (may be called upon to investigate deaths outside their home county).
  • The state forensic examiner and the examiner’s designees (may be asked to respond when local coroners are unavailable).
  • Indirectly affects families, funeral providers, and criminal investigations that depend on timely death determinations.

Procedural and timeline details

  • Bill amends and reenacts NDCC § 11‑19.1‑06.
  • Legislative actions recorded: introduced (filed) 11/12/2024; passed both chambers (House vote 82–11; Senate vote 47–0); emergency clause adopted; returned to House and enrolled; Governor approval recorded 3/21/2025; filed with Secretary of State 3/24/2025. The bill is identified as Act 409.
  • Because an emergency clause was adopted, the law took effect immediately upon the Governor’s approval and filing (3/21–3/24/2025), rather than at a later effective date.

Practical impact/notes

  • The amendment formalizes cross‑county cooperation for coroner duties and creates a statutory fallback to the state forensic examiner when local resources cannot respond due to distance or conditions.
  • The change is procedural/operational in nature; it clarifies authority and response options but does not create substantive new duties beyond existing investigative obligations. Potential operational impacts include coordination between counties and possible additional demands on the state forensic examiner in exceptional circumstances.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.