WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HRES 1227

Condemning State-level energy policies that restrict domestic oil production, increase gasoline prices, and undermine American energy security and national defense.

119th Congress Introduced by Ken Calvert

The resolution condemns state policies that restrict domestic oil production or raise gasoline prices, asserting they threaten U.S. energy security and national defense.

Submitted in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1227

Summary of HRES 1227 (116th?) — Condemning State-level energy policies that restrict domestic oil production, increase gasoline prices, and undermine American energy security and national defense

Note: The bill details provided are limited to the Title, action history, and sponsor information. The following summary focuses on the stated purpose in the bill’s title, the committees it was referred to, and the potential implications of such a resolution.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill is a House resolution that condemns state-level energy policies perceived to:
    • Restrict domestic oil production
    • Increase gasoline prices
    • Undermine American energy security and national defense
  • In short, it calls for opposition to policies at the state level that the sponsors view as detrimental to U.S. energy supply, affordability, and national security interests.

Key provisions and changes

  • As a House Resolution (H.Res.), the measure is non-binding and expresses the sense of the House rather than establishing new law or policy.
  • The resolution condemns specific state actions/policies related to energy production and pricing and calls attention to concerns about potential impacts on energy security and national defense.
  • The bill does not, based on the available information, propose new regulatory requirements on states, nor does it authorize funding or allocate resources.
  • It may include directives for related committees to review or report on the issue, given its referral to multiple committees.

Who/what would be affected

  • State energy policies: The resolution targets state-level policies that the sponsors believe restrict oil production or influence gasoline prices adversely.
  • Federal and national security considerations: The resolution frames energy policy as relevant to national defense, potentially influencing Congressional attention and oversight.
  • House committees: The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on Armed Services for consideration of provisions within their jurisdictions.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history:
    • Submitted in the House on 2026-04-29.
    • Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce and to the Committee on Armed Services for consideration, with a period to be determined by the Speaker.
  • Co-sponsor: Ken Calvert (identified as a co-sponsor).
  • As a concurrent or simple resolution (H.Res.), passage would express the sentiment of the House and would not require signing by the Senate or a presidential signature to have legal effect; it is primarily a statement of position.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Political signaling: The resolution serves as a formal House stance on state energy policies and can influence public discourse and external pressure.
  • Policy leverage: While non-binding, the resolution could prompt investigations, hearings, or oversight from the referenced committees.
  • Legal effect: No direct statutory changes or funding authorizations result from a resolution of this type.
  • Bipartisan dynamics: The bill’s reception may depend on partisan alignment regarding energy policy and state autonomy.

If you have access to the full text of H.Res. 1227, I can provide a more detailed section-by-section breakdown of provisions, exact language, and any specific deadlines or instructions contained in the measure.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.