WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJM 4003

Concerning the United States government joining the global community in formally developing a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by April Berg and 35 co-sponsors

Washington urges U.S. participation in negotiating a global fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty to limit infrastructure expansion and production growth.

By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJM 4003

Legislative bill overview

HJM 4003 is a joint memorial urging the United States federal government to participate in international negotiations to create a global fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. The bill calls for the U.S. to work with other nations to establish formal agreements limiting the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure and production. This is a symbolic measure that expresses legislative intent rather than creating binding law.

Why is this important

A fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty would represent a significant shift in global energy policy and U.S. climate strategy, potentially affecting energy markets, economic development patterns, and international trade agreements. The measure signals whether Washington state lawmakers support a more restrictive approach to fossil fuel expansion as a climate mitigation tool, which could influence state-level policy and influence federal delegations in international negotiations.

Potential points of contention

  • Economic and energy security concerns: Critics may argue that limiting fossil fuel infrastructure could increase energy costs, reduce energy independence, or disadvantage domestic industries in global competition, particularly affecting working-class consumers and energy-dependent regions.
  • Feasibility and enforcement: Skeptics question whether such a treaty is achievable given major fossil fuel-producing nations' economic interests and whether international agreements can be effectively enforced without binding consequences.
  • Alternative energy transition readiness: Opponents may contend that restricting fossil fuels before renewable energy infrastructure and technology are sufficiently developed could create reliability gaps and stranded workers in transition communities.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.