Bill
HB 1409
ND HB 1409 aimed to broadly define 'interest' and 'interested party' in judicial remedies, allowing equitable interests and representation to broaden standing.
Status and procedural history
- Bill number: HB 1409
- Title/purpose (as filed in North Dakota): Create and enact a new section to chapter 32‑01 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to general provisions for judicial remedies.
- Introduced: November 19, 2024. Read first time: March 11, 2025; referred to Corrections.
- Final status (ND): Died in House committee at sine die adjournment (not enacted).
- Note: Multiple different bills in other states also used the number “HB 1409” (Maryland, Arkansas, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, etc.). This summary focuses on the North Dakota version included in the provided materials.
Main purpose and intent
- To add a definition section to NDCC chapter 32‑01 that clarifies and broadly defines the term “interest” and the meaning of an “interested party” in judicial actions. The intent is to standardize how courts should interpret who has standing or an interest in civil and criminal proceedings.
Key provisions (textual summary)
- Adds a new section titled "Interest defined" (to NDCC chapter 32‑01) that states:
- “Interest” should be liberally interpreted and may be either a legal interest or an equitable interest.
- An “interested party” in a judicial action is any party that has a legal interest or an equitable interest in the subject property or subject rights of a civil or criminal action.
- Defines a party with an equitable interest as one whose benefit, property, or rights may be affected by a judicial decision.
- Provides that a party with a legal interest in property or rights may be represented by a party who has an equitable interest in the subject property or rights of the judicial action.
Who and what would be affected
- Litigants and potential litigants: individuals or entities asserting or affected by legal or equitable interests in property or rights (e.g., owners, creditors, lienholders, beneficiaries).
- Courts and procedural practice: judges would apply a liberal interpretation of “interest” when evaluating who is an “interested party” for purposes such as standing, joinder, intervention, or notice.
- Attorneys and parties that represent or assert claims: the provision explicitly contemplates representation by parties holding equitable interests, which could affect who may appear or act for another party in certain actions.
- Criminal and civil matters: text applies generally to civil or criminal actions where interests or rights are implicated.
Potential impacts and considerations
- Clarifies and broadens standing: By requiring “liberal” interpretation, more persons with equitable interests may qualify as interested parties, potentially increasing parties eligible to intervene, receive notice, or be bound by judgments.
- Procedural effects: Courts may see more motions to intervene or to join parties; potential for increased litigation over whether a claimed equitable interest suffices as an “interest” under the new definition.
- Representation clause: Allowing representation by a party with an equitable interest could simplify some proceedings (fewer formal parties) but also raise questions about conflicts of interest and appropriate authorization.
- No fiscal data or agency impacts were specified for North Dakota in the text provided.
- Because the measure did not pass in committee, none of these changes take effect.
Bottom line
HB 1409 (ND) sought to add a broadly worded statutory definition of “interest” and “interested party” to North Dakota’s judicial remedies chapter to ensure a liberal construction that recognizes both legal and equitable interests and permits representation by those with equitable stakes. The bill died in committee and was not enacted; however, if reenacted in future sessions, it could broaden who the courts treat as having standing or being an “interested party,” with attendant procedural consequences.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
