WeVote
Log In

Bill

TB

Bill

HR 8436

Cold War Military Force Repeal Act

119th Congress Introduced by Tom Barrett and 4 co-sponsors

The bill repeals Public Law 85-7, removing the legal authority it provided for U.S. Middle East policy and peace-promoting actions.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8436

Summary of H.R. 8436 (118th? 119th Congress) – Cold War Military Force Repeal Act

Note: Based on the text provided, this summary reflects the bill as introduced and its stated provisions. Always consult the official bill text for the definitive legal language and status.

Overview

  • Bill Name: Cold War Military Force Repeal Act
  • Bill Number: H.R. 8436
  • Session: 119th Congress
  • Introduced by: Rep. Jared Golden (and co-sponsors Reps. Barret and Rashida Tlaib)
  • Intro Date: April 22, 2026
  • Committee: House Committee on Foreign Affairs (referred on introduction)
  • Short Title: This Act may be cited as the “Cold War Military Force Repeal Act.”

Purpose and Intent

  • The primary purpose of the bill is to repeal a preexisting joint resolution aimed at promoting peace and stability in the Middle East.
  • The bill explicitly seeks to nullify Public Law 85-7 (the joint resolution referenced in the text) by repealing the statutory authorization.

Key Provisions

  • Section 2 – Repeal of the Joint Resolution: The core provision repeals the joint resolution titled “A joint resolution to promote peace and stability in the Middle East” (Public Law 85-7; codified at 22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.).
    • By repealing this joint resolution, the bill would remove the legal authority or framework established under that resolution for U.S. policy actions aimed at promoting peace and stability in the Middle East.
  • Section 1 – Short Title: Establishes the act’s official name for citation purposes: “Cold War Military Force Repeal Act.”

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • Who is affected:
    • The repeal targets a long-standing joint resolution that historically informed U.S. policy in the Middle East.
    • Federal agencies and policymakers responsible for implementing or interpreting U.S. foreign policy in the region, including the Legislative and Executive Branch resources aligned with that authority.
  • Policy and legal impact:
    • Removing the mandate or authorization contained in the 1960s-era joint resolution may shift or constrain certain tools, posture, or messaging historically connected to that framework.
    • The practical effect would depend on how the repeal interacts with other statutes, authorizations, and ongoing foreign policy initiatives in the Middle East.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Status: Introduced in the House on April 22, 2026; referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • Next steps (typical path): If moved forward, the bill would need to pass the House (and then Senate), possibly undergo amendments, and be sent to the President for signature or veto.
  • Effective date: The text provided does not specify an implementation date; typically, repeal becomes effective upon enactment and publication of the law, unless otherwise stated.

Practical Considerations and Context

  • The bill is narrowly focused on repealing a specific older joint resolution related to Middle East policy.
  • It does not appear to add new authorities or funding; rather, it seeks to remove an existing authorization framework.
  • Given the historical nature of Public Law 85-7 (stemming from the Cold War era), supporters might frame the repeal as a modernization or simplification of U.S. foreign policy authorities, while opponents might stress risks to existing policy continuity or regional stability mechanisms.

For readers seeking deeper understanding, review the full text of Public Law 85-7 and the current U.S. Code provisions at 22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. to evaluate how repeal would alter statutory authorities and policy tools.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.