WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1748

Clerks, Court - As introduced, requires a person ordered to use an ignition interlock device to provide the clerk of the court with documentation showing qualifications for certain assistance on the date the person was ordered to use the device to show need to participate in the electronic monitoring indigency fund. - Amends TCA Section 55-10-419.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Dave Wright

Tennessee requires proof of financial need at time of interlock device order to access state indigency fund assistance covering device costs.

Signed by Governor.
#clerks #court
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1748

Legislative bill overview

HB 1748 requires individuals ordered to install ignition interlock devices to submit documentation to the court clerk proving their financial need on the date of the order to qualify for assistance through an electronic monitoring indigency fund. This establishes a mechanism for low-income drivers to demonstrate eligibility for cost relief on these devices, which prevent intoxicated driving.

Why is this important

Ignition interlock devices can cost $500-$1,500 upfront plus monthly fees ($40-$100), creating financial barriers for low-income individuals ordered to use them. Without indigency assistance, some people may avoid compliance, perpetuating safety risks. This bill operationalizes a funding mechanism to help economically disadvantaged drivers meet legal requirements.

Potential points of contention

  • Documentation burden: The requirement to provide same-day documentation may be impractical for individuals experiencing financial hardship who lack immediate access to proof of income or asset information.
  • Funding source unclear: The bill references an "electronic monitoring indigency fund" but doesn't specify how it's financed, raising questions about sustainability and adequacy of resources to cover all qualifying applicants.
  • Eligibility criteria undefined: The bill doesn't specify what documentation qualifies or what income thresholds determine need, leaving implementation details to agency discretion and potentially creating inconsistency across jurisdictions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.