WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 6184

Civil procedure: other; firearm industry responsibility act; provide for. Amends 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.101 - 600.9947) by adding sec. 3845.

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Abraham Aiyash and 18 co-sponsors

Michigan bill adds civil liability for firearm manufacturers, distributors, and dealers for damages caused by firearms, modifying existing industry legal protections.

referred to second reading
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6184

Legislative bill overview

HB 6184 adds Section 3845 to Michigan's civil procedure law, creating a new legal framework that would allow lawsuits against firearm manufacturers, distributors, and dealers for damages caused by firearms. This effectively removes or modifies existing legal protections that currently shield the firearm industry from liability for how third parties use their products.

Why is this important

This bill addresses a fundamental tension in product liability law: whether companies should be held responsible for harms caused by legal products used by others. If passed, it could expose Michigan's firearm industry to significant litigation costs and potential damages, while proponents argue it creates accountability for irresponsible sales practices. The practical effect would be substantial—either deterring certain business practices or generating major legal and financial consequences for manufacturers and retailers.

Potential points of contention

  • Federal preemption concerns: The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is federal law that shields firearm manufacturers from most liability; Michigan's authority to override this is legally questionable and likely to face constitutional challenges.
  • Scope of liability: The bill's specific language about which parties are liable and under what circumstances is critical—overly broad liability could affect legitimate businesses, while narrow definitions may limit the law's practical effect.
  • Economic impact on industry: Firearm-related businesses argue this creates unsustainable litigation costs even for frivolous claims, while supporters contend industry practices should carry consequences like other consumer products.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.