WeVote
Log In

Bill

JA

Bill

HB 6051

Civil procedure: other; civil actions for criminal sexual conduct; provide exception to notice requirements for actions filed in the court of claims. Amends sec. 6431 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.6431). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6047'26

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joey Andrews and 22 co-sponsors

HB 6051 tightens notice and timing for Michigan state claims, adding detailed filing content and broad notice transmission, with retroactive application if related bills pass.

bill electronically reproduced 06/04/2026
#civilprocedure:other #courts:other
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6051

Summary of HB 6051 (Michigan, 2025-2026)

Purpose and intent

  • HB 6051 seeks to amend section 6431 of the Revised Judicature Act (1961 PA 236, MCL 600.6431) to modify how and when claims against the State of Michigan may be filed, particularly in relation to civil actions for criminal sexual conduct.
  • The bill appears tied to HB 6047 and would enact changes with retroactive application to actions pending as of its effective date and certain actions brought under section 5851b(4).

Key provisions and changes

  • General filing window (current baseline): Under existing law, a claimant generally must file a written claim or notice of intent to file a claim within 1 year after the claim accrues (MCL 600.6431(1)).
  • Content requirements for claims/notices (MCL 600.6431(2)): Any claim or notice must include:
    • (a) Time and place where the claim arose
    • (b) A detailed statement of the nature of the claim and damages
    • (c) Identification of the state department/agency involved
    • (d) Signature and verifier
  • Transmission to the state and agencies (MCL 600.6431(3)): Claimant must furnish copies to the clerk for transmission to the attorney general and each designated state department/agency.
  • Deadline for property damage or personal injury claims (MCL 600.6431(4)): Such claims must be filed within 6 months after the event.
  • Exceptions (MCL 600.6431(5)): The section does not apply to:
    • (a) Claims for compensation under the wrongful imprisonment compensation act (2016 PA 343)
    • (b) Claims to which section 5851b applies
  • Retroactive application (Enacting section 1): The act amends and applies retroactively to actions pending on the effective date and to certain actions under section 5851b(4).
  • Effective date condition (Enacting section 2): The act’s effectiveness is contingent on enactment of HB 6047 or related bill (S00303’25 / H00303’25) from the 103rd Legislature.

Who is affected

  • Claimants against the State of Michigan and its departments, commissions, boards, institutions, arms, or agencies who pursue civil claims, including those arising from personal injuries or property damage, criminal conduct claims, or other state-related actions.
  • State departments and agencies that would receive notice or copies of claims or notices (via the clerk of the court of claims).
  • Parties seeking compensation under specific exceptions (e.g., wrongful imprisonment compensation act) or those governed by section 5851b.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • If enacted with retroactive effect, the changes could impact claims already in process as of the effective date.
  • The general 1-year filing deadline remains a baseline; however, the bill’s precise retroactive implications could alter how pending claims are treated.
  • The requirement to provide copies to multiple state entities and to specify detailed information emphasizes formalized notice and documentation.
  • The conditional enactment (tied to HB 6047) means the bill’s full effect depends on passage of related legislation.

Practical impact

  • Potentially expands or clarifies the procedural framework for filing claims against the state, particularly by codifying detailed notice requirements and transmission to state entities.
  • The retroactive provision could affect ongoing litigation by applying the amended rules to actions already in progress.
  • For individuals pursuing civil actions related to criminal sexual conduct or other state actions, the bill may affect timing and notice obligations, as well as which claims fall under certain exceptions.

If you want, I can compare these changes to the current law text line-by-line or outline potential scenarios (e.g., a personal injury claim vs. a criminal sexual conduct claim) to illustrate how the new requirements would apply.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.