WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 662

Civil cause of action establishment for the nonconsensual removal of a condom

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Doron Clark and 4 co-sponsors

Minnesota bill establishes civil lawsuit right for condom removal without consent, enabling victims to sue for damages for this form of sexual deception.

Authors added Oumou Verbeten; Clark; Westlin; Johnson Stewart
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 662

Legislative bill overview

SF 662 creates a civil cause of action in Minnesota law allowing individuals to sue for damages when someone removes a condom during sexual activity without consent—a practice commonly referred to as "stealthing." The bill establishes this as a distinct tort claim, enabling victims to pursue compensation through civil courts rather than relying solely on criminal remedies.

Why is this important

Stealthing is a violation of sexual autonomy and reproductive choice that currently lacks explicit legal recourse in many jurisdictions. This bill addresses a gap in existing law by providing a direct legal remedy for a specific form of sexual deception that undermines consent. It reflects evolving legal recognition of reproductive coercion as a serious harm warranting civil liability.

Potential points of contention

  • Proof and enforcement challenges: Establishing that removal was nonconsensual may present evidentiary difficulties, particularly in cases without witnesses or where consent dynamics are disputed.
  • Scope of civil liability: Questions about whether civil courts are the appropriate venue versus criminal law, and whether civil remedies adequately address the harm compared to criminal prosecution.
  • Definition precision: Potential ambiguity around what constitutes "removal" and whether the bill adequately defines the moment consent is violated, which could affect litigation outcomes and fairness to defendants.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.