WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 650

Civil Actions - Maryland Uniform Public Expression Protection Act

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jon Cardin and 6 co-sponsors

Maryland would adopt the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, enabling courts to dismiss civil lawsuits against speakers for public statements before trial, balancing free speech against litigation access.

Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m.
#a
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 650

Legislative bill overview

HB 650 enacts Maryland's version of the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), a model law designed to provide early dismissal protections for defendants in civil lawsuits related to public speech and petition activity. The bill would allow courts to dismiss claims against individuals for statements, conduct, or other expression made in connection with public participation before the case proceeds to trial, with limited exceptions for defamation, fraud, and private figure cases.

Why is this important

This legislation directly affects the balance between free speech protections and access to civil courts for individuals who claim harm from public statements or actions. The bill could reduce litigation costs for defendants engaged in public discourse but may also shield speakers from accountability in civil cases, potentially impacting individuals seeking damages for reputational or economic harm caused by allegedly false or harmful statements.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of "public expression": Defining what qualifies as protected public speech versus private commercial conduct, particularly regarding statements made on social media or in limited audiences
  • Exception carve-outs: Disagreement over whether the bill's exceptions (defamation, fraud, private figures) are sufficiently narrow or dangerously broad, affecting journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens differently
  • Access to courts: Concern that early dismissal mechanisms may prevent legitimate claims from reaching discovery or trial, potentially disadvantaging plaintiffs without immediate proof of falsity or malice

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.