WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2082

Children - As introduced, specifies that a parent's or legal guardian's action of raising, guiding, or instructing the parent's or legal guardian's child in a manner consistent with the child's biological sex is not a basis for certain findings or actions by the court, does not constitute the criminal offense of child abuse, child neglect, or child endangerment, and must not be considered as a negative factor by a court in determining a custody arrangement in the best interest of the child. - Amends TCA Title 36, Chapter 6; Title 37, Chapter 1 and Title 39, Chapter 15.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Mary Littleton

Tennessee bill shields parents from legal consequences for raising children consistent with biological sex, blocking abuse findings and custody penalties.

Comp. became Pub. Ch. 846
#children
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2082

Legislative bill overview

HB 2082 would protect parents and guardians from legal consequences if they raise children in ways aligned with the child's biological sex. The bill specifies this parenting approach cannot constitute abuse or neglect, cannot trigger court intervention, and must not negatively impact custody decisions.

Why is this important

This bill directly addresses disputes over parental rights and child welfare determinations in cases involving gender identity issues. It would significantly limit court authority to intervene in parenting decisions related to biological sex affirmation, potentially affecting custody battles, protective services investigations, and child welfare policy across Tennessee.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition and scope: The bill doesn't define what "consistent with biological sex" means in practice, potentially creating enforcement ambiguity around clothing, activities, social transition, or medical care decisions
  • Medical care implications: Unclear whether this shields parents who refuse gender-affirming medical care or, conversely, protects those who pursue it—depends on interpretation of "biological sex consistency"
  • Child welfare tension: May conflict with existing child abuse/neglect statutes that courts use to protect children from harm, creating questions about which law takes precedence
  • Constitutional considerations: Could face challenges regarding parental rights versus child welfare standards and whether blanket immunity from judicial review violates due process

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.