Bill
SB 2619
Overview: SB 2619 is a bill that would require the revocation of a charter school's charter if the school remains rated as "D" or "F" for longer than two consecutive years. The bil
Overview: SB 2619 is a bill that would require the revocation of a charter school's charter if the school remains rated as "D" or "F" for longer than two consecutive years. The bill has died in committee after being introduced on March 13, 2025.
Purpose and Intent: The main goal of this bill is to hold charter schools accountable for their academic performance and ensure that students are receiving a high-quality education. Proponents argue that charter schools should be subject to the same standards and consequences as traditional public schools, while critics contend that the bill could unfairly penalize schools serving disadvantaged populations.
Key Provisions:
- Requires the state's charter school authorizing body to revoke a charter school's charter if the school receives a "D" or "F" rating from the state's school accountability system for two consecutive years
- Provides an exception to the revocation requirement if the charter school can demonstrate significant academic improvement or extenuating circumstances
- Directs the state education department to develop a process for appealing charter revocation decisions
Affected Parties and Impacts: The bill would primarily affect charter schools that are struggling to meet academic performance standards, as well as the students and families who attend those schools. It could lead to the closure of underperforming charter schools, potentially disrupting the education of thousands of students. The bill may also impact the broader charter school sector, as it could create uncertainty and make it more difficult for new charter schools to open.
Procedural and Timeline Considerations: The bill has died in committee, meaning it did not advance further in the legislative process. This could be due to a lack of support, concerns from stakeholders, or other political factors. If the bill were to be reintroduced in the future, it would need to go through the full legislative process again, including committee hearings, amendments, and votes by the full legislature.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
