Censuring Representative LaMonica McIver of New Jersey.

119th Congress Introduced by Andy Biggs and 2 co-sponsors

Censure Rep. LaMonica McIver; requires her to appear in the House for a public censure reading, while the Ethics Committee investigates for possible further discipline.

Submitted in House

Summary of HRES 408: Censure of Representative LaMonica McIver

What the bill would do

HRES 408 is a House Resolution that would formally censure Representative LaMonica McIver of New Jersey.

It requires Rep. McIver to appear in the well of the House for the pronouncement of the censure.

It specifies that the censure would be delivered with a public reading of the resolution by the Speaker.

It directs the House Committee on Ethics to conduct an investigation into Rep. McIver and to consider further disciplinary action, as appropriate under House rules and precedent.

Key provisions

The House of Representatives censures Representative LaMonica McIver.

Rep. McIver must forthwith present herself in the well of the House for the pronouncement of censure.

Rep. McIver will be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker.

The Committee on Ethics shall conduct an investigation into Rep. McIver and consider further disciplinary action, as appropriate under House rules and precedent.

Legislative actions and status

Introduced: May 13, 2025.

Status: Submitted in the House.

Referred to: House Committee on Ethics (on May 13, 2025).

Sponsors: Claudia Tenney (cosponsor), Pat Harrigan (cosponsor), Andy Biggs (cosponsor). (No primary sponsor specified in the provided information.)

Who would be affected

Rep. LaMonica McIver would be the primary subject of the resolution.

The House as an institution would carry out the ceremonial censure and the formal ethics process.

The House Committee on Ethics would oversee the subsequent investigation and any recommended disciplinary actions.

Procedural and timeline considerations

After introduction, the resolution is referred to the House Committee on Ethics, initiating an ethics investigation.

If acted upon, the House would conduct or receive the Ethics Committee’s findings and determine subsequent steps under House rules and precedent.

The censure itself would be public, with the Speaker reading the resolution, and Rep. McIver required to appear in the House for the pronouncement.

Potential impact and considerations

Legal/constitutional effect: Censure is a formal rebuke and a recognized form of discipline within the House; it does not remove a member from office but can accompany stricter oversight or further disciplinary actions.

Political/precedent impact: Establishes a formal process for addressing alleged misconduct through a public censuring action and a concurrent ethics investigation, potentially informing future similar proceedings.

If you’d like, I can add a brief comparison to typical House disciplinary steps or outline possible subsequent actions the Ethics Committee might consider under common House rules.