WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 888

Campaigns and Campaign Finance - As enacted, prohibits political campaign committees formed to support or oppose a measure from receiving, soliciting, or accepting contributions or expenditures from a foreign national; requires such political campaign committees and persons making independent expenditures supporting or opposing a measure to file certain disclosures regarding funding sources with the registry of election finance. - Amends TCA Title 2, Chapter 10.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Chris Todd

Tennessee bans foreign contributions to ballot measure campaigns and requires disclosure of funding sources to state election regulators, effective immediately.

Pub. Ch. 506
#campaignsandcampaignfinance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 888

Legislative bill overview

HB 888 prohibits political campaign committees and independent expenditure groups focused on ballot measures from accepting contributions or solicitations from foreign nationals. The bill requires these committees and independent spenders to file detailed disclosures about their funding sources with Tennessee's election finance registry.

Why is this important

Foreign influence in domestic elections is a persistent national concern. This bill creates concrete restrictions and transparency requirements at the state level to prevent foreign money from flowing into Tennessee ballot measure campaigns, while also increasing public visibility into who is funding these efforts.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition clarity: The bill may leave room for interpretation about what constitutes a "foreign national" contribution (e.g., corporations with foreign ownership, foreign-born U.S. citizens, dual nationals) and enforcement mechanisms
  • Independent expenditure burden: Disclosure requirements on independent spenders could create administrative costs and complexity, potentially deterring grassroots advocacy groups with limited resources
  • Free speech considerations: Some may argue expanded disclosure requirements chill political speech, while others view them as necessary transparency; constitutional challenges are possible depending on implementation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.