WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 3480

Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast information for fee collection use prohibition

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Andrew Lang

SF 3480 bars government and contractors from using ADS-B data to assess or collect aviation fees, boosting privacy while forcing agencies to seek alternative revenue methods.

Referred to Transportation
#airportsandaircraft #datapracticesandprivacy
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 3480

Summary of SF 3480 — Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast information for fee collection use prohibition

Overview

SF 3480 is a Minnesota Senate bill introduced on May 5, 2025, and referred to the Transportation Committee. The bill’s subject matter sits at the intersection of airports and aircraft, data practices, and privacy. A companion bill exists in the House as HF 3266.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill appears to establish a prohibition on using automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) information for fee collection purposes. In other words, it would bar government entities (and potentially others subject to state data laws) from leveraging ADS-B data to determine, calculate, or enforce fees.
  • The objective suggested by the title is to limit surveillance-derived fee assessments and to protect privacy or data-use boundaries around ADS-B information.

Key provisions (as indicated by title and scope)

  • Prohibition on the use of ADS-B data for fee collection. This would restrict agencies from relying on ADS-B information to assess or collect aviation-related fees.
  • Placement within the context of airports and aircraft, and alignment with data practices and privacy considerations, indicating a concern for how ADS-B data is collected, stored, shared, or used in fee-related processes.
  • The exact statutory text, definitions, penalties, and enforcement mechanisms are not provided in the summary available here, so the specifics of who is covered (state agencies, local authorities, private contractors, etc.) and what constitutes a violation remain to be confirmed in the bill’s full text.

Affected parties

  • State government entities involved in aviation, airport management, and fee collection related to aircraft and airspace operations.
  • Airports, flight operators, aircraft owners and operators, and possibly local government aviation authorities that interact with ADS-B data in revenue contexts.
  • Stakeholders concerned with privacy and data practices in aviation surveillance.

Legislative status and timeline

  • Introduced: May 5, 2025
  • Referred to: Transportation Committee
  • Companion: HF 3266 (House of Representatives)

Potential impact and considerations

  • Privacy and data-use protections could be strengthened by restricting ADS-B data usage for revenue purposes.
  • Agencies may need to identify alternative methods for fee assessment that do not rely on ADS-B data, potentially affecting administrative processes and revenue streams.
  • The ultimate impact will depend on the final language, including definitions, scope, exemptions, enforcement, and effective dates.

Next steps

  • Review the full bill text to confirm definitions, scope, and enforcement provisions.
  • Monitor committee actions in Transportation for hearings, amendments, and potential passage.
  • Compare SF 3480 with HF 3266 to understand any differences or alignment between the Senate and House proposals.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.