WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 606

Auctioneer's Commission

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Luke Rankin

Prohibits New York funding to nonprofits that support Israeli settlement activity, requiring certification and enforcing cuts to grants/contracts for violators.

Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 606

Bill summary — S 606: "Not on our dime!: Ending New York funding of Israeli settler violence act"

Note up front: the materials you provided include multiple, inconsistent documents (a U.S. Senate report on a NASA/Chincoteague wells bill, a Massachusetts bill about sewage overflow testing, and metadata listing sponsors from different jurisdictions). The full text of the New York bill titled “Not on our dime!: Ending New York funding of Israeli settler violence act” was not included. The summary below is therefore based on the bill title, the metadata you gave (sponsors, referrals, status), and reasonable, clearly‑labeled inferences about likely provisions. I list data gaps and recommended clarifications at the end.

Purpose and intent

According to its title, S 606 aims to stop New York public funding (direct or indirect) that supports Israeli settlement activity characterized here as “settler violence.” The stated intent appears to be to prohibit not‑for‑profit corporations (likely those receiving New York State funding, grants, contracts, or other benefits) from engaging in unauthorized support of Israeli settlement activity.

Key provisions (inferred / likely structure)

Because the bill text was not provided, these are plausible elements the bill would contain based on its title and usual legislative form:
- Definitions: who counts as a “not‑for‑profit corporation,” what constitutes “support” (financial assistance, in‑kind services, advocacy), and how “Israeli settlement activity” and “settler violence” are defined.
- Prohibition: a statutory ban on state funding, grants, contracts, tax benefits, or other assistance to not‑for‑profit entities that provide unauthorized support to Israeli settlement activity (subject to definitions).
- Certification and disclosure: requirements for nonprofits to certify they do not support settlement activity (or to disclose relevant activities).
- Enforcement: mechanisms (contract termination, denial of grants, civil penalties, debarment), and an agency responsible for oversight (likely a state procurement or corporations authority).
- Exceptions/waivers: humanitarian, legal, academic, or other narrowly defined activities may be exempted.
- Reporting: reporting requirements to the legislature or to a named state agency.

Who would be affected

  • Not‑for‑profit corporations incorporated or operating in New York that receive state funding, contracts, or tax benefits.
  • State agencies and authorities that award grants and contracts (would need compliance procedures).
  • Beneficiaries of affected nonprofits (services could be disrupted if organizations lose funding).
  • Vendors and grantors who must amend contracts, solicitations, and certification processes.

Procedural status / timeline (from provided metadata)

  • Introduced: February 18, 2025 (as provided).
  • Referred to: Corporations, Authorities and Commissions (status shown as “REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS”).
  • Sponsors listed in your materials: Timothy M. Kaine (primary), Mark R. Warner (cosponsor), Robert Jackson, Julia Salazar, Jabari Brisport (primary), Kristen Gonzalez — note: some named sponsors (Kaine, Warner) are U.S. Senators and suggest conflation with unrelated federal legislation; this should be verified.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Legal and administrative burden on nonprofits to certify and document activities; potential chilling effect on advocacy or international programming.
  • State agencies would need new compliance, monitoring, and enforcement capacity.
  • Possible litigation risks (First Amendment, preemption, vagueness) depending on statutory language and scope.
  • Effects on New Yorkers relying on nonprofit services if providers lose funding.

Data gaps & recommended next steps

  • Obtain and review the bill text to confirm precise definitions, scope, enforcement mechanisms, and exceptions.
  • Clarify jurisdiction (New York State bill vs. federal or other state bills) and correct sponsor listing.
  • Assess budgetary implications and agency implementation requirements once language is available.
  • Identify related bills and committee reports for legislative history and fiscal estimates.

If you can provide the bill’s full text or a reliable legislative summary, I will produce a detailed section‑by‑section summary and an impact analysis tailored to the actual language.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.