Bill Summary – SF 4656 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)
Title
Assist the return to Minnesota of persons removed to other states due to alleged immigration law violations
Purpose and intent
SF 4656 seeks to facilitate the return to Minnesota of individuals who have been removed or relocated to other states on the basis of alleged immigration law violations. The bill appears to aim at enabling state authorities to take actions intended to reunite or readdress cases for such individuals within Minnesota, potentially shifting certain processes, responsibilities, or coordination from other jurisdictions back to Minnesota. The exact statutory mechanisms are not provided in the available text excerpt, but the title indicates a focus on recovery, reintegration, or reprocessing within Minnesota’s system for those affected by prior removals for immigration-related concerns.
Key provisions and changes (illustrative pending details)
Because the provided information only includes the bill’s title and introduction metadata, the following provisions are inferred but not explicitly stated in the excerpt. A complete bill text would be required for precise language. Potential areas the bill may address include:
- Coordination with federal or out-of-state authorities to identify individuals removed to other states who have ties to Minnesota.
- Procedures for proposing and approving the return of individuals to Minnesota for immigration-related review or status adjustment.
- Funding or grant authority to support reentry efforts, case management, or legal services.
- Provisions ensuring due process, safety, and non-discrimination during any return or reentry process.
- Data sharing or reporting requirements to track outcomes of returns or reintegrations.
- Timeline and sunset provisions or performance benchmarks.
Important: The exact scope, definitions (e.g., who qualifies as “persons removed” and what constitutes “due to alleged immigration law violations”), and administrative processes would be specified in the enacted text. The introduction and committee referrals imply judicial and public safety considerations, suggesting potential involvement of courts, prosecutors, or-law enforcement agencies.
Who would be affected
- Individuals who have been removed or relocated to other states because of alleged immigration law violations and who have connections to Minnesota.
- Minnesota agencies responsible for immigration, public safety, judiciary, and related social services, should the bill authorize state action or funding.
- Legal service providers and nonprofit organizations involved in immigration matters, if the bill funds or mandates assistance.
- Potentially, families and communities in Minnesota linked to affected individuals through kinship, residency, or employment.
Procedural and timeline aspects
- Introduction and first reading occurred on March 23, 2026.
- The bill has been referred to two committees: Judiciary and Public Safety.
- Co-sponsors include Zaynab Mohamed, Lindsey Port, Erin Maye Quade, Matt Klein, and Alice Mann (with Mann and Port added to authors on March 25, 2026).
- As a 2025-2026 session measure, the bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, chamber floor votes, and reconciliation with the other legislative chamber (if applicable) before sending to the governor for signature or veto. Specific dates, fiscal notes, and committee action cycles would be determined by the regular legislative calendar.
Notes and next steps
- To provide a precise, authoritative summary, the full text of SF 4656 is needed. The current information covers title, purpose as implied by the title, sponsorship, and initial procedural path.
- Readers should review the bill’s actual language for:
- Definitions and eligibility criteria.
-Fiscal impact statements and funding authorizations.
-Specific authorities granted to state agencies.
-Protection of civil liberties and due process guarantees.
-Implementation timelines and any transition provisions.
If you provide the full bill text, I can produce a detailed point-by-point summary of provisions, fiscal implications, and the exact process timeline.
