WeVote

Bill

Bill

AM 1040482

APPOINT-STEPHEN JAMES LEFAVER

104th Regular Session Introduced by Laura Murphy

Authorizes the appointment of Stephen James Lefaver to a specified state position and defines the appointment terms and duties.

Assigned to Executive Appointments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AM 1040482

Bill Summary: AM 1040482 (Illinois, 104th Session)

Purpose and Intent

  • This amendment appears to concern the appointment of a specific individual, Stephen James Lefaver, to a particular role or position within the state government or a related authority. The bill’s title, “APPOINT-STEPHEN JAMES LEFAVER,” suggests its primary aim is to authorize or confirm an appointment rather than create policy or program changes.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • The core provision is likely to designate Stephen James Lefaver for an appointed position. Specific language might:
    • Set or confirm the appointment authority (e.g., governor, agency head, board, or commission) responsible for the appointment.
    • Establish the term length, expiration, or renewal process for the appointment.
    • Outline scope of duties, responsibilities, or authority associated with the role.
    • Define qualifications, background checks, or eligibility criteria for the appointee.
    • Include any reporting requirements or oversight provisions tied to the appointment.
  • As an amendment (AM), the bill may modify existing statutes or authorize a one-off appointment without creating broader policy changes.

Who or What Would Be Affected

  • The direct beneficiary is Stephen James Lefaver, who would be appointed to the specified position.
  • The affected entity could be a state agency, department, board, or commission responsible for the position.
  • Potential broader impact includes:
    • Governance and decision-making within the concerned agency.
    • Stakeholders involved with the position’s purview (e.g., public stakeholders, employees, or regulated interests).
    • Compliance and statutory alignment with other related appointments.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • As an amendment bill, it would typically follow standard legislative procedures for approval:
    • Introduction and assignment to committee for review (e.g., executive appointments, government operations, or judiciary if applicable).
    • Possible hearings, amendments, and votes in both chambers.
    • A signing or veto phase by the governor, with potential effective date stated within the amendment.
  • The specific effective date or term duration would be articulated in the enacted language, if approved.

Additional Notes

  • The bill lists Laura Murphy as a co-sponsor, indicating support or collaboration from another member in the legislature.
  • Without the full text, exact provisions (term length, duties, qualifications, and reporting requirements) cannot be stated with certainty. Readers should consult the bill’s text or fiscal notes for precise details.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary further by incorporating the exact language from the bill, its committee assignments, or any fiscal impact statements once you provide or share the full text.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.