WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AM 1040127

APPOINT-NATALIE FINNIE

104th Regular Session Introduced by Laura Murphy

AM 1040127 would appoint Natalie Finnie to a named public position, with Senate Executive Appointments confirmation required; impacts agency governance and service delivery.

Appointment Confirmed
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AM 1040127

Summary of AM 1040127 — APPOINT-NATALIE FINNIE

Overview

AM 1040127 is an appointment bill introduced in the Senate on April 1, 2025. The measure is classified as an appointment and is titled “APPOINT-NATALIE FINNIE.” The bill proposes the formal appointment of Natalie Finnie to a specified public position and is currently assigned to the Senate’s Executive Appointments committee for consideration.

Legislative status and actions

  • Introduced: April 1, 2025
  • Sponsor (primary): Sen. Laura M. Murphy
  • Status: Assigned to Executive Appointments
  • Legislative actions to date:
    • 2025-04-01: Received by the Senate (Sen. Laura M. Murphy)
    • 2025-04-01: Assigned to Executive Appointments

Purpose and intent

  • The primary purpose of AM 1040127 is to appoint Natalie Finnie to a particular public position that requires Senate Executive Appointments confirmation or participation in the appointment process.
  • The specific position, agency, board, term length, compensation, and any conditions or qualifications are not specified in the information provided. These details would typically appear in the text of the bill or the accompanying docket materials.

Key provisions (as described by the available information)

  • Authorization of the appointment of Natalie Finnie to a named public role.
  • Placement within the executive appointment framework, indicating potential Senate review or confirmation via the Executive Appointments process.
  • No other substantive policy or programmatic changes are described in the available bill summary.

Who is affected

  • Natalie Finnie: would become a holder of the designated public position if the bill advances and is enacted.
  • The relevant agency, board, or commission associated with the appointment would gain a member, potentially affecting governance, operations, or policy direction depending on the role.
  • The public could experience changes in governance or service delivery associated with the appointed position, contingent on the role’s responsibilities.

Timeline and process considerations

  • After assignment to Executive Appointments, the bill would typically proceed through committee review, possible hearings, and a confirmation vote in the Senate, depending on the chamber’s rules.
  • The exact timeline depends on committee scheduling, confirmation hearings, and floor action, which are not specified in the provided information.
  • The full text of the bill (to identify the exact position, term length, compensation, and any qualifications or conditions) would be necessary for a complete assessment.

Next steps for readers

  • Review the full bill text and any fiscal notes or agency analyses to determine:
    • The exact title of the appointment (position and agency)
    • Term length and compensation
    • Required qualifications or disqualifications
    • Any conditions, limitations, or sunset provisions
  • Monitor updates from the Executive Appointments committee for hearing dates and votes.
  • Check for any public hearings or dashboards tracking the status of AM 1040127.

If you’d like, I can include a brief contextual note on how executive appointments typically move through the Senate in this legislature, or help track subsequent actions once they become available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.