APPOINT-DONNA MARIE RICHTER

104th Regular Session Introduced by Laura Murphy

The bill designates Donna Marie Richter for an appointed position within a state agency or body.

Assigned to Executive Appointments

Summary of AM 1040492 (Session 104th, Illinois)

Purpose and intent

This amendment appears to initiate or formalize an appointment related to Donna Marie Richter. The bill’s title, “APPOINT-DONNA MARIE RICHTER,” indicates its primary aim is to designate or confirm an appointment for an individual by name.

The explicit policymaking or governance rationale is not provided in the summary alone, but such measures typically relate to filling a vacancy, creating or approving a position, or authorizing a specific appointment within a state agency, board, commission, or administrative body.

Key provisions and changes (as typically encompassed by appointment amendments)

Appointment designation: The bill names Donna Marie Richter as the individual to be appointed to a specified position.

Entity and scope: The bill would specify the exact board, commission, agency, or office to which the appointment applies (e.g., a state agency or a quasi-governmental body). The precise locus of authority (e.g., Governor’s office, legislative committee, or other appointing authority) would be defined in the full text.

Qualifications and term: The bill may outline qualifications, term length, and eligibility criteria for the appointment, including any required expertise, residency, or tenure restrictions.

Duties and authority: It could reference the general duties, scope of authority, or responsibilities associated with the appointment, aligned with the appointing body’s statutory framework.

Confirmation process: If applicable, the bill might specify whether the appointment requires confirmation by a legislative body or is an executive appointment.

Who would be affected

The primary affected party is Donna Marie Richter, as the appointee.

The appointing authority (e.g., Governor, legislative committee, or related agency) would be involved in formalizing the appointment.

The broader organization or agency holding the position would experience changes in leadership or governance, potentially altering priorities, oversight, or decision-making dynamics.

Procedural and timeline considerations

Process: The bill serves as a formal legislative instrument to authorize or record the appointment. Depending on Illinois practice, it could be a joint resolution, a simple appointment authorization, or a procedural statute.

Effective date: The measure would specify when the appointment takes effect (often upon enactment or upon a specified date).

Sunset or term limits: If included, the bill may indicate whether the appointment terminates at a set date or continues until a successor is appointed.

Confirmation requirements: The bill would state whether the appointment requires additional steps, such as Senate confirmation or other checks, though many executive appointments do not require legislative confirmation in Illinois unless otherwise specified.

Notes

The available information is limited to the bill’s title and sponsor details. The full bill text would provide definitive provisions, including the exact appointing authority, the position being filled, term length, qualifications, and any reporting or oversight requirements.

Co-sponsor: Laura Murphy, indicating bipartisan or cross-chamber collaboration in supporting the measure.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary further once you provide the full text or key sections of AM 1040492.