APPOINT-DANIEL THOMAS FENSKE

104th Regular Session Introduced by Laura Murphy

The bill designates Daniel Thomas Fenske for a specified public appointment, formalizing his appointment to a state office or body.

Assigned to Executive Appointments

Bill Summary - AM 1040405 (104th Illinois General Assembly)

Purpose and intent

The bill appears to be a designation or appointment-related measure concerning individuals named in the title “APPOINT-DANIEL THOMAS FENSKE.”

With a co-sponsor listed (Laura Murphy), the proposal suggests formalizing an appointment process or recognizing an appointment to a public office or board, consistent with Illinois practice for memorializing or authorizing a specific appointment.

Key provisions and changes

Appointment focus: The bill designates or authorizes the appointment of Daniel Thomas Fenske to a specified public role. The exact office, board, commission, or authority is not stated in the provided title alone, but the language implies formal confirmation or designation by the legislature or relevant appointing authority.

Processual action: Typically, such AM (amendment) or appointment bills prespecify the appointing authority (e.g., Governor, a state agency, or a legislative committee) and may outline duties, term length, or eligibility criteria for the appointment.

Sponsor details: The bill lists a main sponsor with a co-sponsor (Laura Murphy), indicating bipartisan or cross-aisle legislative support intended to advance the appointment.

Who or what would be affected

The primary effect is on Daniel Thomas Fenske, who would receive the specified appointment.

The appointed office or body would experience staffing or governance changes, depending on the nature of the appointment (e.g., a board, commission, advisory council, or state agency oversight).

Stakeholders associated with the appointing body and the interests served by the particular office (constituents, industry groups, or public beneficiaries) may experience indirect impact through decisions or governance linked to the appointment.

Procedural and timeline considerations

As an Illinois bill, passage would require approval through the standard legislative process: introduction, committee assignment, committee hearing and vote, floor consideration, and final passage by both chambers, followed by any required gubernatorial action.

If the bill is an appointment designation, timing considerations often align with the term start date for the appointed position or a vacancy that necessitates immediate filling.

The language may specify term length, renewal options, or conditions for removal, depending on the office being filled.

Notes for readers

The exact office or authority to which Daniel Thomas Fenske is being appointed is not explicit in the provided title. To fully understand the substantive impact, access to the bill’s full text (Section-by-section) would clarify the precise position, eligibility criteria (if any), term length, duties, and any qualifications or conflicts of interest provisions.

If you are evaluating this bill for advocacy, governance, or public accountability purposes, consider verifying:

The appointing authority and term duration
Any mandatory reporting or oversight requirements
Potential consequences for existing appointees or structures
Budgetary or fiscal implications tied to the appointment

If you can provide the full text or committee analysis, I can deliver a more detailed, line-by-line summary of provisions and any fiscal impact.