APPOINT-CARYN TUCKER

104th Regular Session Introduced by Laura Murphy

The bill appoints Caryn Tucker to a specific Illinois government role, defining authority, duties, term, and potential confirmation or oversight requirements.

Assigned to Executive Appointments

Summary of Bill AM 1040454 (104th Illinois General Assembly)

Purpose and intent

The bill appears to be an appointment-related measure directed at selecting or confirming an individual named Caryn Tucker for a specific role or position within Illinois government or a related jurisdictional agency.

Co-sponsor listed: Laura Murphy, indicating bipartisan or cross-sponsor support within the chamber.

Key provisions and changes

Appointment-focused: The primary substance is to appoint Caryn Tucker to a specified role. The bill would establish or formalize the appointment with associated duties, authority, and term details.

Scope of authority: The bill likely delineates the responsibilities, reporting structure, and eligibility criteria for the appointed position (e.g., qualifications, terms of service, and scope of duties).

Confirmation/approval process: Depending on the bill’s language, it may outline whether the appointment requires confirmation by a legislative body, a particular commission, or is an executive appointment with internal agency approval.

Term and renewal: The bill may specify the duration of the appointment and whether renewal or extension is permitted, along with any performance or review criteria.

Who or what would be affected

Individual: Caryn Tucker would be the primary beneficiary/holder of the appointed role, subject to the position’s duties and authority.

Government or agency: The appointment would impact the specific agency, department, or office to which Caryn Tucker is being appointed, including governance, oversight, and operational procedures.

Stakeholders: Depending on the role, affected groups could include staff within the agency, program participants, other state agencies, and potentially the public, if the position influences policy implementation or service delivery.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Sponsor and co-sponsor identifiers are provided, but there is no explicit timeline in the summary. Typically, appointment bills follow standard legislative scheduling for readings, committee assignments, hearings, and potential confirmation processes.

If the bill requires confirmation, timelines would include committee review, chamber floor consideration, and potential gubernatorial action (depending on Illinois’ specific constitutional or statutory framework for appointments).

Implementation date: The bill may specify an effective date upon enactment and any phased implementation if applicable.

Practical considerations for readers

Check the exact language in the bill text for the precise title of the position, the agency involved, term length, and any statutory duties or powers conferred.

Verify whether confirmation by the Illinois General Assembly or another body is required, and any criteria for removal or renewal.

Consider how this appointment would affect agency leadership, policy priorities, and public accountability.

If you’d like, I can locate the full bill text to extract exact provisions (position title, agency, term, duties) and provide a more detailed, line-by-line breakdown.