WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 2460

Any state permitting, county regulations or municipality shall treat private schools the same as public schools when it comes to building permits, fees charged, safety standards, waste water management, septic systems, and the timeliness of permitting process

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Eric Brooks and 8 co-sponsors

Arizona HB 2460 expands CHIP eligibility to children under 19 up to 300% FPL, starting Oct 1, 2025, potentially boosting enrollment and state/federal costs.

To House Education
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2460

Summary — HB 2460 (conflicted/multistate data)

Note up front: the supplied document appears to conflate two different bills both labeled “HB 2460” from different jurisdictions. Below are clear, separate summaries of each distinct measure found in the file and the practical effects of each. Please confirm which jurisdiction (Arizona or Illinois) you intend to track if you need further follow‑up.

A. Arizona — HB 2460 (Arizona Revised Statutes §36‑2981 amendment)

Source context: Arizona House, Fifty‑seventh Legislature (Introduced Feb 5, 2025)

Purpose / intent

To change income eligibility thresholds for the Arizona Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) administered by AHCCCS (Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System), expanding eligibility for children under 19.

Key provisions

  • Amends A.R.S. §36‑2981 (definitions), specifically the definition of “member” (a child under 19 whose gross household income qualifies).
  • Replaces prior phased language with a new permanent threshold:
    • Beginning October 1, 2025 and for each fiscal year thereafter, a child is eligible if household income is at or below 300% of the federal poverty level (FPL).
  • Retains other definitions and provisions in the section (contractor, administration, etc.).

Who is affected

  • Children under 19 and their families in Arizona whose household income falls between the previous threshold and 300% FPL will potentially become newly eligible.
  • AHCCCS (administration), contractors (health plans), providers, and state budgeting/finance entities (due to increased enrollment and spending implications).

Procedural/timeline points

  • Effective date for the new income threshold: October 1, 2025 (and annually thereafter).
  • The draft references earlier thresholds and CMS approval language for earlier dates; the 300% FPL floor is the change taking effect Oct 1, 2025.
  • Legislative status in the supplied record: introduced and underwent committee activity; appears to have sponsors from Arizona House and Senate. (Record shows Rule 19(a) / Re‑referred to Rules Committee on 2025‑03‑21.)

Practical impact considerations

  • Expands CHIP eligibility substantially — could increase enrollment and state/federal cost share obligations.
  • Would likely require AHCCCS operational updates (enrollment systems, outreach) and budgetary adjustments.

B. Illinois — HB 2460 (State Commemorative Dates Act)

Source context: Illinois General Assembly (Introduced Feb 4, 2025 by Rep. Mary Gill)

Purpose / intent

To create an annual commemorative observance called “Hero Day.”

Key provisions

  • Adds Section 197 to the State Commemorative Dates Act (5 ILCS 490/197 new).
  • Designates August 27 of each year as “Hero Day,” to be observed statewide to recognize individuals whose commitment to public safety has earned public respect and gratitude.
  • Effective immediately upon becoming law.

Who is affected

  • Statewide public: the law establishes a commemorative observance (no regulatory or funding changes).
  • Public safety personnel and communities may use the day for recognition events.

Procedural/timeline points

  • Immediate effective date upon enactment.
  • Sponsor: Rep. Mary Gill. Legislative actions in the record show referral to Rules Committee and typical placement on calendars; status noted as Rule 19(a) / Re‑referred to Rules Committee.

Practical impact considerations

  • Mostly symbolic/ceremonial; no direct spending or regulatory effects included.

If you want a deeper analysis (budget estimate, likely enrollment increase for the Arizona measure, or legislative path and prospects in either state), tell me which bill/jurisdiction to prioritize.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.