WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 1919

Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act

119th Congress Introduced by Mark Amodei and 124 co-sponsors

The bill would prohibit or tightly restrict CBDCs unless they include strong privacy protections to prevent government surveillance of financial transactions.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 1919

Legislative bill overview

The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R. 1919) aims to impose strict limitations on the development, deployment, and use of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) by the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve. The bill seeks to prohibit the creation or implementation of any CBDC unless it complies with privacy protections that prevent government surveillance or control over individuals' financial transactions. The legislation emphasizes safeguarding personal financial privacy and protecting citizens from potential overreach or abuse through digital currency systems that may enable mass surveillance or government tracking.

Why is this important

This bill addresses growing concerns about privacy, autonomy, and civil liberties in the digital age. As CBDCs could enable unprecedented levels of monitoring and control over personal financial data, this legislation attempts to establish clear boundaries to prevent the government from exploiting digital currency technology to surveil or restrict citizens' financial behavior. Given the increased interest globally in CBDCs, this legislation signals a proactive approach to balancing innovation with fundamental rights.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy vs. Security: Critics might argue the bill stifles technological innovation and national security efforts that use digital currencies.
  • Enforcement Challenges: Defining and enforcing strict privacy protections on a CBDC could be technologically complex and costly.
  • Financial System Impact: Limiting CBDCs might hinder U.S. competitiveness in global finance and delay modernization of payment systems.
  • Ambiguity in Scope: Interpretation of what constitutes or may lead to legal ambiguities and disputes.
  • Government Flexibility: The bill could overly restrict government tools for combating illegal activities like money laundering and terrorism financing.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.