Bill
H 1235
CHIA leads a formal, data-driven, public review of proposed mandated health benefits, delivering transparent analyses within 180 days to inform Ways and Means decisions.
Purpose and basic intent
- H 1235 proposes to update how Massachusetts reviews proposed mandated health benefits (i.e., required health insurance coverage mandates). The bill establishes a formal, data-driven review process led by the Center for Health Information and Analysis (CHIA) to assess the public health, medical, and financial impacts of proposed mandates.
- The overarching goal is to provide policymakers with rigorous analyses before acting on mandated benefits, while preserving transparency and public access to those analyses.
Key provisions and changes
- Definitions and scope (Section 38C(a))
- Introduces “Mandated health benefit bill” as any bill that would require coverage for a particular provider type, disease/condition, treatment/service, or related medical equipment/drugs, under applicable Massachusetts health insurance and employee benefit laws.
- “Center” refers to CHIA (Center for Health Information and Analysis) established under chapter 12C.
- Role of Ways and Means (Section 38C(b))
- When Ways and Means reports favorably on a mandated health benefit bill, they must include a review and evaluation conducted by CHIA.
- Center-driven review process (Section 38C(c))
- Upon request by Ways and Means (House or Senate), CHIA conducts a formal review in consultation with other relevant state agencies.
- CHIA must report to the requesting committee within 180 days (or per a timeline agreed to by the committee and CHIA).
- If CHIA fails to meet the deadline, the committee may report favorably without CHIA’s analysis.
- All analyses must be posted on a searchable public website and available to the public upon request.
- Structure of the CHIA analysis (Section 38C(d))
- The written analysis includes three major impact areas with detailed subpoints:
1) Public health impacts (e.g., population health effects, disparities related to social determinants of health, gender, race, sexual orientation, or gender identity; effects on prevention and vaccination programs; impact on premature death and economic loss).
2) Medical impacts (e.g., effectiveness and medical community recognition; availability and utilization; comparative health outcomes versus alternatives; impact on access to current benefits).
3) Financial impacts (e.g., cost changes over 5 years; changes in utilization and substitutes for other benefits; administrative costs and premium implications; short- and long-range cost estimates; private sector effects; shifting costs to other payers; consumer out-of-pocket costs; accessibility implications; whether access to existing benefits would be affected).
- Note: The drafted excerpt ends mid-list; CHIA’s framework includes numerous subpoints under these categories to assess total effects.
Procedural and timeline aspects
- Status and schedule
- Introduced: February 27, 2025.
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services (2/27/2025) and Senate concurred (2/27/2025).
- Hearing: Scheduled for October 1, 2025, with multiple reschedules/adjustments reflected in the bill’s legislative actions. The latest notice shows a hearing window from 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM in Committee Room B-1 (with virtual attendance options).
- Related actions
- Related bill: HD 4027 (replaces) is associated with this measure.
- The hearing and scheduling history shows several changes in venue and end times as the date approached.
Who would be affected
- Primary: CHIA (Center for Health Information and Analysis) would conduct mandatory analyses for mandated health benefit bills.
- Legislative committees (House and Senate Ways and Means) that handle health benefit legislation, which would receive formal CHIA analyses.
- Health insurers, employers, health plans, and state health programs (e.g., MassHealth, Massachusetts Health Connector) could be impacted indirectly through the analyzed effects on costs, access, and coverage decisions.
- The general public would gain enhanced transparency, via CHIA analyses posted on a public searchable website.
Notes
- The bill emphasizes transparency, data-driven decision-making, and a structured timeline for analysis, with potential pushback if CHIA does not deliver within the allotted time.
If you’d like, I can add a side-by-side comparison with the current review process (if any) and highlight potential policy implications for specific mandated benefits.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
