WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 399

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO 3-DIMENSIONAL PRINTERS AND FIREARMS.

153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Introduced by Krista Griffith and 6 co-sponsors

HB 399 would require 3D printers sold in Delaware to include blocking technology to prevent printing firearms or parts, with a DOJ study on feasibility and a six-month rollout afte

Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 399

Bill overview

  • Bill: House Bill 399 (HB 399)
  • Session/Jurisdiction: 153rd Delaware General Assembly, Delaware
  • Sponsor: Representative Griffith (co-sponsors listed)

  • Title: An Act to amend Title 6 of the Delaware Code relating to 3-dimensional printers and firearms

  • Status: Introduced and assigned to the Judiciary Committee (House) on June 11, 2026

  • Fiscal note: Prepared by the Office of the Controller General

    • Indicates the act’s fiscal impact is indeterminable at this time
    • Any potential cost impact is not anticipated before Fiscal Year 2028
    • Initial FY2027 cost: $0
    • FY2028 and beyond: Indeterminable (depends on working group outcomes)

Purpose and intent

HB 399 aims to regulate the sale and delivery of 3-dimensional (3D) printers in Delaware in order to prevent the printing of firearms or firearm parts. The bill introduces mandatory blocking technology on 3D printers sold in the state and directs the Department of Justice (DOJ) to study the feasibility and practicality of requiring such blocking technology statewide.

Key provisions and changes

  • Restriction on sales/delivery: The bill prohibits the sale or delivery of 3D printers in Delaware unless the printer is equipped with blocking technology designed to prevent the printing of firearms or illegal firearm parts.

  • Effective dates:

    • The prohibition on sale/delivery with blocking technology becomes effective six months after the DOJ adopts related regulations following notice.
    • The act becomes effective immediately upon signature by the Governor (per assumptions in the fiscal note).
  • DOJ working group: The Department of Justice must convene a working group to evaluate:

    • The technological feasibility of requiring blocking technology on 3D printers sold in Delaware
    • Operational feasibility and practical implementation considerations
  • Recommendations and timeline: The working group is charged with making recommendations and evaluating feasibility; results will inform implementation and resource needs.

  • Enforcement and penalties: While the bill text references prohibitions and associated enforcement provisions and penalties, the fiscal note indicates specific enforcement details are part of the act but not enumerated in the summary. (Enforcement provisions would be established in the bill and related regulations.)

  • Fiscal considerations: The exact costs to implement and enforce the bill are not determinable at this time. Resources required depend on the working group’s recommendations and regulatory decisions, with potential fiscal impact not expected before FY 2028.

Who would be affected

  • 3D printer retailers and sellers: Will be required to ensure sold printers include blocking technology or otherwise comply with the prohibition.

  • Consumers in Delaware: May be restricted from purchasing 3D printers that are not equipped with blocking technology.

  • Department of Justice (DOJ): Responsible for regulating, overseeing, and coordinating the working group, as well as implementing any blocking technology requirements and related enforcement.

  • Manufacturers and technology developers: Potentially affected by mandated blocking technology standards and any resulting regulatory requirements or compliance costs.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Immediate effect: The act’s general provisions become effective immediately upon gubernatorial signature.

  • Regulatory development period: Six months after the DOJ issues notice of regulations, the prohibition requiring blocking technology would take effect.

  • Working group timeline: The act requires the DOJ to convene a working group to study feasibility and make recommendations, though specific deadlines for reporting are not provided in the summary.

  • Fiscal impact timeline: Based on the fiscal note, any real fiscal impact is not anticipated before FY 2028 due to the need for regulatory adoption and study results.

Notes

  • The fiscal note emphasizes uncertainty about implementation costs until the working group completes its evaluation.
  • The bill is in early stages of the legislative process, with assignment to the Judiciary Committee in the House as of June 11, 2026.
  • The sponsoring and co-sponsoring legislators indicate broad legislative interest in regulating 3D printing technology relative to firearms.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.