Bill
HB 372
The bill would reform how Delaware Justice of the Peace Courts are organized and run, affecting court governance, operations, and administration.
HB 372 (Session 153) – Delaware
Summary of Purpose, Key Provisions, and Impact
Overview
- Legislative action: Introduced and assigned to the House Judiciary Committee on April 21, 2026.
- Jurisdiction: Delaware
- Title: AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS
- Sponsors: Multiple co-sponsors including Dave Wilson, Tim Dukes, Bill Carson, Madinah Wilson-Anton, Sean Lynn, Ray Seigfried, and Bill Bush
Purpose and Intent
- The bill seeks to amend Title 10 of the Delaware Code to address the organization and operation of the Justice of the Peace Courts. While the exact text of amendments is not provided in the summary, the emphasis is on reforming how these courts are structured, managed, or run, with potential implications for judiciary administration, case processing, or court governance at the Justice of the Peace level.
Key Provisions (Expected Areas Based on Title 10 Amendments)
- Court Organization: Possible revisions to the administrative structure of Justice of the Peace Courts, including roles, duties, and positions within the courts.
- Governance and Administration: Potential changes to how these courts are overseen, including appointment or election processes for JP judges, terms of office, or standards for supervision.
- Procedures and Operations: Amendments that affect court operations such as docket management, case assignment, scheduling, and intake processes.
- Funding and Resources: Possible provisions related to budget, funding streams, or resource allocation to support JP Court operations.
- Public Access and Transparency: Provisions that enhance accessibility, transparency, or reporting requirements for JP Courts.
Who Would Be Affected
- Justice of the Peace Courts in Delaware and their judges.
- Court administration, clerks, and support staff within the JP Court system.
- Parties appearing before JP Courts (including pleadants, defendants, and witnesses) who may experience changes in procedure, scheduling, or accessibility.
- State or county judiciary personnel involved in administrative oversight and budgeting for the JP Courts.
Procedural and Timeline Considerations
- Current action: Bill introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. No specific committee hearing/markup dates are provided.
- Next steps: Committee review, possible amendments, floor consideration in the House, and eventual passage to the Senate (if applicable) with potential gubernatorial action.
- Effective dates: Not specified in the summary; typically, such acts include an effective date (e.g., upon enactment or a future date) and may include phased implementation.
Notes
- The summary above is based on the bill’s title and general legislative practice for amendments to the organization and operation of a specific court system. The exact text would clarify precise changes, such as incremental reforms, targeted provisions (e.g., attorney access, mediation roles, electronic filing), and any fiscal impact.
- For a complete understanding, review the bill’s actual language, fiscal notes, and any committee reports once published.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
