WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1008

An Act relative to the Massachusetts rental voucher program

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Mike Brady and 18 co-sponsors

Creates and funds a restructured MRVP offering tenant-based and project-based vouchers, prioritizing extremely low-income households within 80% AMI, with strict admin within approp

Hearing scheduled for 07/23/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1008

Summary — S.1008: "An Act relative to the Massachusetts rental voucher program" (MRVP)

Status & next steps
- Filed in the Massachusetts Senate (Senate Docket No. 1573 / S.1008). Principal sponsor: Sen. Joan B. Lovely, with multiple cosponsors.
- Referred to the committee on Housing. Hearing scheduled: July 23, 2025, 1:00–5:00 PM in A‑1.
- Legislative actions to date include introduction, readings and placement on the Senate calendar.
- Note: the package of documents provided also contains unrelated Idaho bill language and a fiscal note; this summary focuses on the Massachusetts MRVP bill text included in the packet.

Purpose
- Establish and fund a restructured Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program (MRVP) to provide rental assistance through mobile (tenant-based) and project-based vouchers to help low-, very low-, and extremely low-income households obtain decent, stable, affordable housing and promote economically mixed communities.

Key provisions (from available text)
- Administration and appropriation
- The Department (Massachusetts housing department named in statute) shall establish and administer MRVP through administering agencies, subject to appropriation.
- The department will issue the number of vouchers that fully utilize—but do not exceed—the appropriation. Voucher subsidy and administrative payment levels must be set so total payments stay within the appropriation.

  • Eligibility

    • Households with net income at or below 80% of area median income (AMI) are eligible.
    • At least 75% of vouchers must be targeted to households whose income at initial occupancy does not exceed 30% of AMI.
    • The department may convert project-based units with expiring project-based contracts to mobile (tenant-based) vouchers for the affected households.

  • Voucher types and payment standards

    • Both mobile (tenant-based) and project-based vouchers are authorized.
    • Payment standards (the maximum subsidy level per unit size/market area) generally must be between 100% and 110% of HUD Fair Market Rent (FMR) or Small Area FMR.
    • Administering agencies may request exceptions; the department may require approval when standards fall outside 100–110%.
    • Reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities: agencies may set payment standards up to 120% of FMR without department approval; standards above 120% require department approval. The department may not add extra requirements about adjusted-income rent contributions for such accommodations.

  • Tenant rent share

    • Tenant contribution generally capped at 30% of monthly adjusted net income.
    • Tenants may opt to pay more than 30% to cover rent above the voucher payment standard, but this excess may not exceed 40% of adjusted net income during the first year of occupancy.
    • The department will adjust for households that pay utilities separately.

  • Unit quality and inspections

    • Units must meet State Sanitary Code minimum fitness standards (inspections are mandatory and cannot be waived).
    • Pre-assistance inspection required; biennial inspections thereafter.

  • Administrative structure & data

    • The department shall maintain a single voucher management system and collect program data (full scope truncated in provided text).
    • Administrative fee: the bill sets a monthly administrative fee provision — text references not less than HUD Housing Choice Voucher administrative fee rates and also cites "$80.00 per voucher, per month" in the draft.

Who is affected
- Primary beneficiaries: low-, very low-, and extremely low-income Massachusetts households (especially households at ≤30% AMI).
- Administrating agencies and the state housing department will incur program administration responsibilities.
- Landlords and owners participating in project-based and tenant-based voucher programs.
- State budget/appropriations: program size and scope depend on funding appropriated in the state budget.

Potential fiscal and policy impacts
- Costs are subject to annual appropriation; the department is required to limit voucher issuance and payment levels to the appropriation.
- Targets assistance to the lowest‑income households (at least 75% to ≤30% AMI), which may increase demand for deeper subsidies.
- Clarifies payment standard rules and reasonable accommodation policy, potentially increasing flexibility to house persons with disabilities.
- Requires ongoing inspections and a centralized voucher management system, which may increase administrative workload and costs (to be covered by the appropriation/administrative fees).

Limitations / notes
- The bill text provided is partially truncated; some implementation details (e.g., full data collection requirements, precise definitions, and administrative procedures) are incomplete in the available copy.
- The legislative packet also included unrelated Idaho legislation text and a fiscal note; readers should consult the official bill file on the Massachusetts Legislature website or the House/Senate clerk for the final, complete text before making programmatic or legal interpretations.

If you want, I can:
- Pull the complete published bill text and produce a line‑by‑line breakdown, or
- Prepare a short briefing for committee members highlighting fiscal implications and likely implementation issues.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.