WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 873

An act relating to course of conduct in stalking cases

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Kenneth Goslant and 3 co-sponsors

H 873 refines Vermont's stalking law definition of "course of conduct" to clarify prosecution standards and strengthen victim protections.

Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 873

Legislative bill overview

H 873 modifies Vermont's stalking laws to clarify or redefine what constitutes a "course of conduct" in stalking cases. The bill was recently introduced and referred to the Judiciary Committee for review. Without access to the specific text, the exact changes appear focused on how repeated behaviors meeting the stalking threshold are legally defined and prosecuted.

Why is this important

Stalking laws depend heavily on defining "course of conduct"—the pattern of repeated behavior that distinguishes criminal stalking from isolated incidents. Clarifying this definition affects how prosecutors charge offenders, how victims can obtain protection orders, and what evidence is required to secure convictions. Clear statutory language can improve victim safety by making it easier to hold perpetrators accountable.

Potential points of contention

  • Definitional clarity vs. prosecutorial discretion: Tightening the definition of "course of conduct" (e.g., requiring a specific number of incidents) could make prosecution easier or harder depending on the specific language chosen
  • Balance between victim protection and accused rights: Changes that broaden the definition may better protect victims but could raise concerns about due process and what behavior qualifies as criminal
  • Implementation challenges: Law enforcement and prosecutors may need training or resources to apply new definitions consistently across jurisdictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.