WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LD 267

An Act Regarding The Remote Appearance Of Counsel In Pretrial Nontestimonial Criminal Matters

132nd Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Anne Carney and 8 co-sponsors

Allows defense counsel to appear remotely in pretrial nontestimonial matters, boosting access and efficiency while keeping in-person rights for testimonial proceedings.

Became Law without Governor's Signature
#arraignment #counselremoteappearance #criminalprocedure
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LD 267

Summary — LD 267: An Act Regarding the Remote Appearance of Counsel in Pretrial Nontestimonial Criminal Matters

Purpose

LD 267 authorizes the remote (telephonic or audiovisual) appearance of counsel in pretrial criminal proceedings that are nontestimonial in nature. The bill is intended to modernize court procedure by permitting attorneys to participate remotely in certain pretrial events, improving access to counsel and court efficiency while preserving in‑person proceedings where necessary.

Status and Procedural History

  • Introduced: January 23, 2025 (Sponsor: Rep. Lee of Auburn)
  • Committee: Judiciary (Work sessions 03/05/25, 03/27/25; OTP‑AM recommended)
  • Committee Amendment: Committee Amendment "A" (H‑107) was adopted by the Legislature (05/13/25).
  • Passed both Houses and sent for enactment (May 2025).
  • Became law without the Governor’s signature: June 3, 2025.
  • Fiscal notes (preliminary and as amended) conclude: No fiscal impact.

Key Provisions (based on available information)

The available documents provide the bill title and legislative actions but do not include the full statutory text. From the title and subject classification, the bill does the following in general terms:
- Permits attorneys to appear remotely on behalf of clients in pretrial nontestimonial criminal matters (for example, certain arraignments, scheduling hearings, pretrial conferences, or procedural motions that do not involve testimonial evidence).
- Limits the authorization to “nontestimonial” matters — i.e., proceedings that do not require witness testimony or taking sworn testimony in open court — preserving in‑person appearances when testimonial or confrontation rights are implicated.
- Likely sets conditions or standards for remote appearances (such as technology requirements, identification/authentication of counsel, recordkeeping, and assuring defendant waivers when required), although the specific procedural safeguards are not included in the supplied documents.

Who Is Affected

  • Defense counsel and public defenders: broader flexibility to appear remotely in qualifying pretrial matters.
  • Defendants: potential for improved access to counsel and faster pretrial processing; rights preserved for testimonial proceedings.
  • Prosecutors and court staff: procedural adjustments to accommodate remote attorney participation.
  • Courts and court administrators: operational and policy implementation for remote appearances (technology, scheduling, and record protocols).

Fiscal Impact

All reviewed fiscal notes (preliminary and as amended) report no fiscal impact to the State.

Implementation & Considerations

  • The enacted law likely requires procedural rules or administrative orders for implementation (technology standards, recordkeeping, and security).
  • Courts may need to adopt local practices for when remote appearances are permitted and how consent/waivers are handled.
  • Protecting defendants’ confrontation and due process rights remains a primary consideration; testimonial matters remain subject to in‑person requirements.

For full operative language and any technical details (definitions, conditions, and procedural rules), consult the enacted bill text on the Maine Legislature website or the Office of the Revisor of Statutes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.