WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 363

An Act providing for the annual designations and holiday observances of Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha in this Commonwealth.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Heather Boyd and 28 co-sponsors

Allows regional transit authorities to operate buspool service beyond 10 miles into neighboring jurisdictions, with local consent and intergovernmental agreements.

Laid on the table
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 363

Summary — HB 363: Regional Public Transportation Authority Service Area

Status: Serial referral to Finance stricken (bill pending committee action)
Introduced: March 11, 2025 (Primary sponsor: Rep. Jake Reives)
Statutory target: G.S. 160A‑610 (General powers of regional public transportation authorities)

Purpose / Intent

HB 363 amends the statutory powers of regional public transportation authorities to permit a regional authority to operate buspool service beyond the 10‑mile territorial limit that otherwise restricts how far authorities may extend fixed-route public transit outside their jurisdiction. The stated goal is to enhance regional mobility by allowing authorities to operate shared vehicle services that cross greater distances into neighboring jurisdictions.

Key provisions

  • Amends G.S. 160A‑610 (general powers of the Authority) to clarify/authorize that a regional public transportation authority may operate buspool service extending more than ten miles outside its territorial jurisdiction.
  • Retains the broader statutory framework for regional authorities (powers to contract, operate transit, enter intergovernmental agreements, etc.). The amendment specifically addresses the mileage limitation that applies to extending service into other political subdivisions.
  • Does not repeal the statutory requirement that a unit of local government may deny consent to service that would otherwise be extended into that unit (the bill leaves local consent rules intact where those provisions remain in the statute).

Who is affected

  • Regional public transportation authorities: gain explicit authority to operate buspool service beyond the previous 10‑mile limit (subject to any local consent/denial provisions in statute or intergovernmental agreements).
  • Local governments and units potentially served: may see expanded service into their territory; retain ability under statute to consent or deny certain service extensions.
  • Riders and commuters: potential benefit from added shared buspool connections over longer distances (improved regional commute options).
  • Private transit providers: could face increased competition in interjurisdictional shared-ride markets depending on implementation.
  • State agencies (limited): may be asked to review or approve intergovernmental agreements; fiscal effects on the State appear minimal.

Fiscal and administrative impact

  • The bill itself does not specify new funding. Fiscal impacts depend on implementation decisions by authorities (e.g., route expansion, vehicle needs, operating subsidies).
  • Potential for increased operating costs for authorities expanding service; potential for increased federal/state grant opportunities if authorities leverage expanded service to qualify for additional funding.
  • Local governments may incur administrative costs associated with negotiating agreements or managing impacts; impacts are expected to be jurisdiction‑specific.

Legislative status and process notes

  • Introduced March 11, 2025; referred to State & Local Government (with conditional referral to Finance) on March 12, 2025.
  • A serial referral to Finance was struck (April 17, 2025), i.e., the bill’s procedural path was adjusted.
  • Current status: pending committee consideration (check the General Assembly docket for the latest committee actions or amendments).

Practical considerations

  • Implementation will likely require interlocal coordination (service planning, cost‑sharing, fare policy, liability and insurance, and consent of affected local governments).
  • Authorities may need to update operating plans and secure funding for any service expansion.
  • If local governments retain the legal ability to deny consent to certain types of service, practical expansion could be limited by local opposition.

If you want, I can:
- Pull the exact before/after statutory language of the G.S. 160A‑610 amendment,
- Track current committee calendar/status and next hearing dates, or
- Draft a one‑page briefing for a transit authority or county manager explaining operational steps to implement buspool service beyond the 10‑mile limit.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.